Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2014, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,563,461 times
Reputation: 53073

Advertisements

They're kind of cute on little kids, though.

I question putting babies that are learning to walk in them, though. I worked at an early childhood center for a bit this past spring and summer, and was surprised at the non-supportive shoes that people put their just-learning-to-walk babies in. Cute, but not helping them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2014, 10:31 PM
 
338 posts, read 421,135 times
Reputation: 340
Quote:
"They continue to be ubiquitous where I am, but to me, they look like colourful Ace bandages on one's feet. The soles are also too insubstantial for my taste."
Exactly this.

If I have to have loafers, they'd better be Vans, they'd better be made of canvas and have black-and-white (or black-and-red) checkerboard patterns printed on them. Toms just look and seem so... cheap. (And feminine.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2014, 11:49 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,563,461 times
Reputation: 53073
If I need a slip-on, I'm picking Minnetonka moccasins (although they suffer the same insubstantial sole issue, and can't be worn for extended periods of time) or Chuck Taylor Shoreline slip-ons. I have those in cloud grey, and they get allll kinds of wear. Much more flattering on my foot than TOMS.

http://www.shoes.com/productimages/shoes_ia36205.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2014, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Central TX
2,335 posts, read 4,150,246 times
Reputation: 2812
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratchetjaw View Post
The company definitely seems interesting. But their shoes are just ...ing ugly. It makes me comment any time I see some hipster dude wearing them ("hey, great shoes, man. Do they sell men's clothes where you got them?").
My thoughts exactly! These shoes are an instant turn-off on women and men shouldn't even consider them.

On kids, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2014, 06:46 PM
 
Location: The State Line
2,632 posts, read 4,049,782 times
Reputation: 3069
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
Pretty much! But the new school flats are actually pretty cute!

Charcoal Suede Snake Women's Ballet Flat | TOMS
This is more my style, but I'm not certain I'd shell out that much for a pair of flats. Nice pumps, perhaps, but to me, flats are expendable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top