Close to perfection (beauty, looks, thin, women)

[W--Y--D]

Everyone has a different idea of what perfection is but IMO this is pretty damn close to it. I like how her matches the wheat in the background. Now that's my idea of "whole grain"!

[MEDALLOKUYA]

id rate her a 7.

gonna need to do better OP.

[katie45]

We all see each other differently, so that proves that it's "All in the eye of the beholder".

[Kings Gambit]

That chick in the OP would be lucky if she rates a 5 by Los Angeles standards of facial beauty.

She's not ugly, but she just looks below average to me. I wouldnt even notice her if she walked by me.

[MEDALLOKUYA]

Originally Posted by katie45

We all see each other differently, so that proves that it's "All in the eye of the beholder".

True, however, there is a universal standard of beauty recognized by the majority.

[erasure]

Originally Posted by MEDALLOKUYA

True, however, there is a universal standard of beauty recognized by the majority.

And what that would be ? ( other than Nick Bateman of course)))

[W--Y--D]

Originally Posted by Kings Gambit

That chick in the OP would be lucky if she rates a 5 by Los Angeles standards of facial beauty.

She's not ugly, but she just looks below average to me. I wouldnt even notice her if she walked by me.

I'm sure she feels the same way.

[erasure]

Originally Posted by MEDALLOKUYA

Its is physical characteristics. ie symmetry, width of face and eyes, skin, body metrics such as breasts and butt etc etc.

For example take these two woman.

Heather Matarazzo



Jessica Alba



80+ percent of men will pick Alba.

Why? Because beauty / attraction is a physical art. Can be measured. And is Universal on a general level.

Yes, that part I understand. But let's get to the more complicated part; how many men would pick this woman over that one?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...76_640x495.jpg

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/201...alba-2-768.jpg

And how many women would prefer this one over, say, that one?

http://images2.fanpop.com/image/phot...3-1200-944.jpg

http://40.media.tumblr.com/0ba7a8700...031o9_1280.jpg

( You know, I'm giving examples just off top of my mind, not having time to dig too much...)

[MEDALLOKUYA]

Originally Posted by erasure

Yes, that part I understand. But let's get to the more complicated part; how many men would pick this woman over that one?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...76_640x495.jpg

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/201...alba-2-768.jpg

And how many women would prefer this one over, say, that one?

http://images2.fanpop.com/image/phot...3-1200-944.jpg

http://40.media.tumblr.com/0ba7a8700...031o9_1280.jpg

( You know, I'm giving examples just off top of my mind, not having time to dig too much...)

When you have women of relative equal beauty then it comes down to preference.

This in no way diminishes the universal beauty concept.

[erasure]

Originally Posted by MEDALLOKUYA

When you have women of relative equal beauty then it comes down to preference.

This in no way diminishes the universal beauty concept.

No-no, it doesn't, I agree.
But how do you think it became "Universal"?
Do you think it's all "advertisement" or something is built in us within, that dictates us what beauty is, independently from mass media?