Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a woman I find athletic fit women, and medium thick/slim thick women sexy as h*ll. I don't find plus size, or super thin women attractive at all. I also tend to like wider hips and booty, and don't think the slim body but big boobs and no a$$ looks proportionate so I don't find that look attractive as well. But I notice a lot of the white women I know, seem to like that look, while they view my body and my butt as unfavorable.
It does look disproportionate, but that's what I've got to work with. I would rather have sporty little B-cups and a nice bubble butt, but that's just not how my genes played out.
We are not talking about "features" (as in the individual things like eyes, skin color, hair, lip shape, waist size, breast size, etc. that make up a person), we are talking "FAT" or "THIN". Simple.
As have been said before, and as is leading in the poll THIN is more attractive but FIT/ATHLETIC is the MOST attractive.
Totally disagree. For example you may find body type X attractive. But some person who doesn't meet that comes around and has some sort of *it* that makes them attractive. And it is the polar opposite of your preferred type. For some people the whole package ends up working. For example, I generally don't find skinny men attractive. But sometimes some super skinny guy seems really attractive for some reason. Even though they are really skinny. It is part of their aura. And it can happen at any size.
Where does someone like Kim Kardashian (pre baby) fit in? She's not fat. She's not thin. She's not athletic. Oh, she is the REAL definition of "CURVY". Curvy with tiny small waist/stomach nice real boobs (not to mention that she has a beautiful face/skin/hair) so I guess she would be categorized as "CURVY" right?
yes, she is one of the few who really can claim the curvy status. Most women who say they are curvy are fat. Curvy just sounds better.
Totally disagree. For example you may find body type X attractive. But some person who doesn't meet that comes around and has some sort of *it* that makes them attractive. And it is the polar opposite of your preferred type. For some people the whole package ends up working. For example, I generally don't find skinny men attractive. But sometimes some super skinny guy seems really attractive for some reason. Even though they are really skinny. It is part of their aura. And it can happen at any size.
I 100% agree with you, Jade. Some people transcend their looks/body, whatever. Their personality, sound of their voice, their smile, or simply that "je ne c'est quoi." I have been attracted to skinny, nerdy men who at first glance wouldn't think attractive. But something about them drew me to them. Sometimes it just cannot be defined. It just isn't always so cut and dried.
Attractiveness isn't "binary." Just having features XYZ doesn't automatically make you attractive. It is all how the package comes together.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kings Gambit
We are not talking about "features" (as in the individual things like eyes, skin color, hair, lip shape, waist size, breast size, etc. that make up a person), we are talking "FAT" or "THIN". Simple.
As have been said before, and as is leading in the poll THIN is more attractive but FIT/ATHLETIC is the MOST attractive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408
Totally disagree. For example you may find body type X attractive. But some person who doesn't meet that comes around and has some sort of *it* that makes them attractive. And it is the polar opposite of your preferred type. For some people the whole package ends up working. For example, I generally don't find skinny men attractive. But sometimes some super skinny guy seems really attractive for some reason. Even though they are really skinny. It is part of their aura. And it can happen at any size.
For what it's worth, there's a lot to what both of you are saying. KG makes a valid point: to some features won't matter if someone is too fat/thin/short/etc for their preference. For example, a lot of guys who like big boobs say having big boobs doesn't count if she's fat.
At the same time, I agree with you too, Jade. Some women may not have the prettiest face, hottest body, nicest rear end, etc... but the whole package is tied together nicely. Throw in the right personality and this can be the icing on the cake.
It all comes down to individual preference. Which is in essence what this thread is about. The thing is, if she exists there is someone out there who will find her attractive. As for the individual, if you have a woman you find attractive it's a win. It shouldn't matter if nobody else agrees with you.
It does look disproportionate, but that's what I've got to work with. I would rather have sporty little B-cups and a nice bubble butt, but that's just not how my genes played out.
I wasn't trying to offend anyone. Just gave my opinion. I know plenty of men and women that prefer your body type.
When I think of an "attractive" woman, I think it has more to do with a sense of style and a personality (charisma?) than really the build of the person. Mind you, I'm a straight female, so take that for what it's worth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
