Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think shorts can be fine for casual, especially if the guy has nice legs. Like I said in another thread, they can't be too short, too long, too tight or too baggy. Fit and style is really important or it can just be juvenile or vulgar.
I am man and shorts do a lot for me but than again i am 23...
It's not about age. As orangeapple said, too many things can be wrong with them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple
I think shorts can be fine for casual, especially if the guy has nice legs. Like I said in another thread, they can't be too short, too long, too tight or too baggy. Fit and style is really important or it can just be juvenile or vulgar.
That's because this look comes across as "nice guy" and "laid back". I hate wearing it when everyone else is diong the same. I strive to be different. Next time I'm gonna wear a jumpsuit, LOL.
But I thought women were into "bad boys" and not nice guys?
Well its like this, when men wear tight jeans and they have a nice body, we get to picture the nice frame. But shorts are often saggy and long. They serve no purpose in a come-hither way. They just are not described as "sexy". Some are nice, but it doesnt do anything for them is the sexy department. Tight jeans do a better job. IMO.
It depends on what the guy looks like. A great body is the finest accessory/fashion statement you can have.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.