Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
My bad and Google grammar corrector
I meant what you would like to discuss?
The image was reportedly made by Robert Peake, court painter to King James I, and is signed and dated 1608.
Someone will own the only portrait ever made of Shakespeare while he was alive.
Some arts sells on auctions for lots of money. Way, way more, actually.
To my mind the most interesting this about this is the question as to whether or not this is a true depiction of the bard. I offered the link so others could read the article and maybe comment although that was not necessary.
That's how he was depicted and there is no doubt that the portrait is legit.
Why would you think that the painting isn't a true depiction of the bard?
"Those behind its sale claim the connections between Shakespeare and Peake are “extensive” and that the artist was regularly commissioned to paint the portraits of high-ranking members of the court and Jacobean society."
The portrait was extensively investigated. "There is more evidence for this portrait of Shakespeare than any other known painting of the playwright."
I think, whoever is going to spend over $12M for that portrait will make sure that the authentication is correct and legit.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.