Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2013, 04:38 PM
MJ7
 
6,221 posts, read 10,729,615 times
Reputation: 6606

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
This was on the Today show this morning. Apparently they are not even regulated, but come up with by companies based on their best guess of when a product is at peak of freshness. A food scientist who has written a book about it says there has never been a documented case of food poisoning via someone eating food past its' expiration (meat and milk are exceptions, of course).

They said eggs are good 3-5 WEEKS past the date on the package, and that canned/boxed/bottled/jarred foods are fine up to a year past the sell-by or "best by" date if unopened, many canned foods are fine even several years past the date.

I have thrown out many things, cans of soup, bottled salad dressings, etc, because it was past the date, but they said we are wasting money by doing so.

They did say that baby formulas though ARE federally regulated, and you should go by the date for those.
depends on the quality of the product. if you consume steriod pumped cows and chickens, then this would apply. NOT THE SAME FOR ORGANIC.

Real meat (none rghb, no steriods, no chemcials, grass fed) turns quicker, no chemicals or preservatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2013, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Mountain Home, ID
1,956 posts, read 3,633,866 times
Reputation: 2434
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ7 View Post
depends on the quality of the product. if you consume steriod pumped cows and chickens, then this would apply. NOT THE SAME FOR ORGANIC.

Real meat (none rghb, no steriods, no chemcials, grass fed) turns quicker, no chemicals or preservatives.
The law requires vendors to list any chemicals or preservatives on the packaging, even for raw meat. If the package doesn't list any preservatives, it doesn't matter whether the meat is organic or not. It will turn just as fast.

BTW, steroids and growth hormones are not fed to chickens. It's been illegal since the 1950s.

http://www.thepoultrysite.com/articl...-the-confusion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2013, 05:39 PM
MJ7
 
6,221 posts, read 10,729,615 times
Reputation: 6606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesster View Post
The law requires vendors to list any chemicals or preservatives on the packaging, even for raw meat. If the package doesn't list any preservatives, it doesn't matter whether the meat is organic or not. It will turn just as fast.

BTW, steroids and growth hormones are not fed to chickens. It's been illegal since the 1950s.

http://www.thepoultrysite.com/articl...-the-confusion
this is correct, i should have added anti bacterial chemicals, many chickens and cows are over fed to process faster and their internal organs cant keep up with this rapid growth, many die before they even get carted to chopping blocks, i guess a smart marketing ploy would be using full aged chickens rather than 8 weeks old chickens or something along those lines
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2013, 05:40 PM
 
50,704 posts, read 36,411,320 times
Reputation: 76512
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ7 View Post
depends on the quality of the product. if you consume steriod pumped cows and chickens, then this would apply. NOT THE SAME FOR ORGANIC.

Real meat (none rghb, no steriods, no chemcials, grass fed) turns quicker, no chemicals or preservatives.
They said meat and milk/dairy were exceptions. Usually you can tell by the smell if they're bad, though. If milk is a little past the date but it still smells fine, I'll still use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2013, 11:56 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,422,673 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
They said meat and milk/dairy were exceptions. Usually you can tell by the smell if they're bad, though. If milk is a little past the date but it still smells fine, I'll still use it.
Milk should normally be good for a week after the Sell By date.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2013, 05:28 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
This was on the Today show this morning. Apparently they are not even regulated, but come up with by companies based on their best guess of when a product is at peak of freshness. A food scientist who has written a book about it says there has never been a documented case of food poisoning via someone eating food past its' expiration (meat and milk are exceptions, of course).

They said eggs are good 3-5 WEEKS past the date on the package, and that canned/boxed/bottled/jarred foods are fine up to a year past the sell-by or "best by" date if unopened, many canned foods are fine even several years past the date.

I have thrown out many things, cans of soup, bottled salad dressings, etc, because it was past the date, but they said we are wasting money by doing so.

They did say that baby formulas though ARE federally regulated, and you should go by the date for those.
I wonder how many people realize, posting dates on foods has only been in existence maybe 20 years? And sell or use by such and such date means very little.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2013, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Delaware
136 posts, read 381,633 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesster View Post
That's why it's called the SELL BY date. It's for the retailer, not the consumer. They want to sell products they know won't be returned because they're spoiled or stale, so the retailer needs to know when to pull the product or mark it for discount for a quick sale.

My criteria is if it doesn't smell or taste bad, it's still safe to eat. I don't swallow if the taste is off, though.

Exactly!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2013, 10:33 AM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,261,314 times
Reputation: 25501
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
I wonder how many people realize, posting dates on foods has only been in existence maybe 20 years? And sell or use by such and such date means very little.
Sell by dates on fresh products like milk has been around a lot longer than that. On other foods, you are correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top