Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2014, 02:55 AM
 
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,074 posts, read 11,708,824 times
Reputation: 30347

Advertisements

$$$
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2014, 03:24 AM
 
458 posts, read 642,217 times
Reputation: 500
Really? I thought it was the opposite.
It seemed like portions were getting smaller in restaurants as a way to up-sell you dessert.
In a post-recession economy, a lot of restaurants have cheapened their menu quality wise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:16 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,062,989 times
Reputation: 29347
Quote:
Originally Posted by WFW&P View Post
What I don't get is by serving too large of portions diners are not likely to order dessert which, ultimately is money lost.
More money is lost when diners don't come back because they don't feel they are getting enough food for their money. I am 190# and not a huge eater but there have been a few times I ordered a dinner plate and received a plate that couldn't feed a squirrel. If I have to leave a restaurant hungry (and I'm not about to buy two entrees) then I won't be coming back no matter how "good" the food was.

People come in all sizes and appetites. It would be a logistical nightmare for a server/cook to try to match portion size to appetite of individual diners so it's much easier to throw a standard portion size out there that will satisfy most everyone. Better to give the light eater more than they want than to give the heavy eater less than they want.

Hint: you don't have to eat it all. If you are a light eater, eat what you want and leave the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,284,073 times
Reputation: 53066
I am far more likely to return to a restaurant where I am served enough to have leftovers than to one where I left still hungry, for the same cost, if not more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:52 AM
 
4,586 posts, read 5,579,907 times
Reputation: 4369
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
More money is lost when diners don't come back because they don't feel they are getting enough food for their money. I am 190# and not a huge eater but there have been a few times I ordered a dinner plate and received a plate that couldn't feed a squirrel. If I have to leave a restaurant hungry (and I'm not about to buy two entrees) then I won't be coming back no matter how "good" the food was.

People come in all sizes and appetites. It would be a logistical nightmare for a server/cook to try to match portion size to appetite of individual diners so it's much easier to throw a standard portion size out there that will satisfy most everyone. Better to give the light eater more than they want than to give the heavy eater less than they want.

Hint: you don't have to eat it all. If you are a light eater, eat what you want and leave the rest.
Does that mean I only get charged for what I actually eat? See the problem with that is that I don't see any valid reason to overspend! Let alone on food which didn't have to be wasted.

I don't like going to a restaurant where I never get to desert...some of the food is also very filling thanks to the ingredients and their consistency...as in NOT light and airy to leave room. Everything is cooked with heavy oils, tons of flour and corn starch etc...

What's sad, is that people live to eat, rather than eat to live. You can enjoy food without overeating it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 11:40 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,062,989 times
Reputation: 29347
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoProIP View Post
Does that mean I only get charged for what I actually eat? See the problem with that is that I don't see any valid reason to overspend! Let alone on food which didn't have to be wasted.

I don't like going to a restaurant where I never get to desert...some of the food is also very filling thanks to the ingredients and their consistency...as in NOT light and airy to leave room. Everything is cooked with heavy oils, tons of flour and corn starch etc...

What's sad, is that people live to eat, rather than eat to live. You can enjoy food without overeating it.
The actual food cost difference between your large and small portion is a relatively small part of the overall cost. You could get a "lite" version (some restaurants offer it) but it won't cost you much less. More restaurants don't offer it because there is not enough demand for it. Most people will just spend the extra dollar to ensure they have plenty. Again, you don't have to eat it all. Why should a larger person have to get not enough because you can't stop when you've had enough?

What would you do if you owned a restaurant? How would you propose matching portion sizes to individual diner appetites?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,750,982 times
Reputation: 3568
Where I live, it is less expensive to eat out than it is to grocery shop. We eat out 7 nights a week, roughly 5 of those nights at buffets. I have actually lost weight and am eating better. The buffets here are not like the grimy "Golden Corral" or "Ponderosa" variety, but clean, fresh, and delicious. They have live stations where the chefs are preparing the food, and the turnover is very fast. I like the fact that I can eat as much or as little as I desire and don't have to worry about leftovers. If I'm not very hungry, I'll just have a salad. If I'm really hungry, then the prime rib is in trouble!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 01:18 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,938 posts, read 36,737,208 times
Reputation: 40634
How cheap is a buffet that it is cheaper than eating at home? Tough to imagine, honestly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,750,982 times
Reputation: 3568
Normally free (comp'd by the casinos), but at most $15 for 2 people. I mean, yes, I could eat Ramen or mac & cheese at home for less than that, but there is no possible way for us to have fresh salad, steak, shrimp, scallops, etc. at home for less than what we pay at our local buffets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,284,073 times
Reputation: 53066
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoProIP View Post
Does that mean I only get charged for what I actually eat? See the problem with that is that I don't see any valid reason to overspend! Let alone on food which didn't have to be wasted.
And the issue with that is that ordering the "lighter" entree doesn't necessarily cost you any less than the larger one. To me, I'm overspending if I am getting less product for my money. I can split an entree up into three different meals, and then I'm getting three meals for the price of one, which seems the better deal, and no wastage.

I don't tend to eat at restaurants where I don't like the quality, so the "bigger portions, but subpar quality" argument is a nonissue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top