Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They have a certain following, but I have never thought the were as attractive as the earlier Mustangs. Too big and performance was starting to go away after 1970. But if they float your boat..........
I used to feel the same with the 71-73 until I started to look for an older stang. For the most part stang people love the 69-70 Shelby but feel the 71-73 Mustang is to big and they're just about the same size.
This past Feb I picked up my 73 Mach I Tribute (didn't look totally like this when I first got her) and I always get thumbs up. And yes her HP isn't high, but like most people I bought her for cruising, not racing.
1971-1973 Mustangs would not be my first choice of classic 'Stangs, unless it's a convertible like the one in the picture Camaro69 posted in his message. If I were to get a classic Mustang, my first choice would be a 1967-1970. The ones I would definitely stay away from are the Mustang II generation (1974-1978) and early 3rd generation Mustangs that first came out in the 1979 model year.
Ha! I was not going to do a web search to find out, I saw the movie when it came out and my buddies and I decided it was an old Mustang and for all these years that's what I thought.
Those Mustangs were hideous - I would rather have a Torino w/351C of the same year.
They look like Lincoln/Mercury was trying to design some hip car for the older generation as it surely wasn't a Muskrat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.