Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nocontengencies
Homes in group 1 far outnumber group 2.
|
I'm really sorry to hear that.
I've got to assume that as time goes on, group 1 will become smaller than group 2
since group 2 people will tend to try to work on staying much longer and by their
very nature, will have un-American tendencies like having liquid savings to tap.
Don't get me wrong, I still hate the banks and blame them for allowing group 1
to exist in the first place. group 1 isn't hurting the banks by being dick-ish since
the banks don't own the loans nor the REO homes - Fannie and Freddie do.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They told us they are losing one of their homes. I personally believe it was an intentional dump from the beginning. They bought a second house a year ago and just seemed to forget about the first place. When most people move they discuss selling their house and so on but it was like their first house never existed. So they finally said they were in the foreclosure process with the first place. The home they currently live in needs a lot of work and they decided to strip the first house of kitchen cabinets, fixtures and bathrooms to put those items in their new place. I'm pretty shocked they are doing this. It just seems pretty trashy to me. We have another family member that lost their home and they were completely devastated by the whole thing. The wife even cleaned the house top to bottom when they moved out showing pride even though they had to leave. I'm wondering if banks actually pursue people for damaging a property like that. 
