Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Foreclosures, Short Sales, and REOs
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2012, 11:38 AM
 
19 posts, read 124,937 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

Hi,

I'm starting to search for a new home as a principal residence. I want to buy something under market value because 1) it works better for my budget, and 2) to protect myself against further market declines.

I read a book on short sales and foreclosures from the library, and it said that the best opportunity for getting a below market price is to buy a short sale from a seller before the property is listed by an agent and has attracted a lot of attention and competitive offers.

This makes sense, as we are looking in a fairly competitive market with a budget of about 800k, and the demand for the type of home we are looking for could be significant. My question is, is this feasible? Has anyone had any experience in doing this?

The book basically recommends getting in touch with home owners that have received a notice of default. It sounds very difficult and touchy, but if they are headed to foreclosure, maybe it could work out as a win-win situation?

Any experience in this arena or advice would be great. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2012, 11:57 AM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,784,543 times
Reputation: 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by kschpak View Post
Hi,

I'm starting to search for a new home as a principal residence. I want to buy something under market value because 1) it works better for my budget, and 2) to protect myself against further market declines.
You and million of other buyers want this. It's not rocket science and you don't need to reach a book to figure out that buying something (doesn't matter stock/property below market value is the best option.

It's worth a shot to contact the distressed seller. But (depending on what state you are).

I live in Florida. It's pretty public knowledge who's currently behind on their mortgage because you can easily look up properties on county webpages.

The issue with short sells are:
1. Many homeowners (especially ones with school kids will just ride out the short sell/foreclosure) time frame and aren't' interested in putting their home on the market until it's time

2. Some in distress are still looking at a loan modification.

3. You have to find out if there's PMI on the loan. Some homes cannot be saved with a short sell because the 2nd lien holders don't care to negotiate because they get paid no matter if the home goes into foreclosure.

4. And the tricky thing is many banks will want homeowners to carry a balance even if they short sold.

So contacting a homeowner randomly may just be a shot in the dark. You don't know if the homeowner is even interested in selling at this point.

Unfortunately the book you read (good thing you didn't pay for it), it just crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 12:26 PM
 
19 posts, read 124,937 times
Reputation: 15
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I wasn't under the impression that the book was rocket science or an original idea. I merely wanted to educate myself on the proceedings of short sales and foreclosures, and it points out that the best deals exist when you aren't in competition with all of the other buyers looking for a short sale.

I am really just looking for additional perspective and experience from those who have tried to go this route, and have failed or succeeded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 05:39 PM
 
6,824 posts, read 14,036,923 times
Reputation: 5755
A property has to be listed on the market before a lender will look at your lender. Part of the paperwork your realtor must provide to the lender is proof the property has been listed (Copy of MLS Listing).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:14 PM
 
106 posts, read 363,927 times
Reputation: 62
In this market, I would just wait till the bank retains the house, less hassle.

In good economic times, yes that method (from the book) works...but not now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
6,175 posts, read 12,940,454 times
Reputation: 4020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grainraiser View Post
A property has to be listed on the market before a lender will look at your lender. Part of the paperwork your realtor must provide to the lender is proof the property has been listed (Copy of MLS Listing).
This is absolutely not true. One can offer to purchase an unlisted property, and if the seller agrees to sell, a contract for the sale can be written. I have helped several buyer clients do exactly this. A lender will want to see the contract, and will conduct an appraisal to determine the value of the property. An MLS listing will be reviewed if it exists, but is in no way a requirement for loan approval.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:24 AM
 
6,824 posts, read 14,036,923 times
Reputation: 5755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
This is absolutely not true. One can offer to purchase an unlisted property, and if the seller agrees to sell, a contract for the sale can be written. I have helped several buyer clients do exactly this. A lender will want to see the contract, and will conduct an appraisal to determine the value of the property. An MLS listing will be reviewed if it exists, but is in no way a requirement for loan approval.

I work for a major lender as a loss mitigation specialist. We will not consider a short sale unless the house has been listed on the market. I can't say this rule applies to all lenders but it certainly does with major ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,046 posts, read 28,481,404 times
Reputation: 9470
Quote:
A property has to be listed on the market before a lender will look at your lender. Part of the paperwork your realtor must provide to the lender is proof the property has been listed (Copy of MLS Listing).
That has been my experience as well. There may be some banks who will look at a short sale offer on an unlisted property, but not most. I think all of the short sales we have processed have required the property to be listed in MLS as a condition of considering the short sale, unless the first is getting paid in full. If only the 2nd is taking a short, they usually don't care, in my experience, since they are usually getting more than they would on a normal short sale. We've had two of those, and one wasn't listed.

I don't think you can even enter an offer into the equator.com system on an unlisted property, and several of the biggest lenders use that system for their short sales (Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Nationstar, along with a couple I'm not familiar with)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
6,175 posts, read 12,940,454 times
Reputation: 4020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grainraiser View Post
I work for a major lender as a loss mitigation specialist. We will not consider a short sale unless the house has been listed on the market. I can't say this rule applies to all lenders but it certainly does with major ones.
I think I may have misunderstood your initial post. I was looking at this from the perspective of the buyer, and thought you were asserting that the buyers lender would only lend the purchase money if the house was listed on an MLS.

Sellers lenders, when considering whether to approve a short sale, want to be sure that it's an arms length transaction, and the best way to do that is to have the property listed in the MLS, so I can see the reason for such a requirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,582,493 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by kschpak View Post
...I read a book on short sales and foreclosures from the library, and it said that the best opportunity for getting a below market price is to buy a short sale from a seller before the property is listed by an agent and has attracted a lot of attention and competitive offers. ...
I agree with previous posts that it is highly unlikely that you will find a short sale that is not listed as this is normally a requirement of the seller's bank.

You could work with an agent to set up email notifications for new short sale listings so you can try to be first in line with an offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Foreclosures, Short Sales, and REOs
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top