Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Garden
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2014, 08:55 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
Pretty sure politics are not in play in this situation, as much as you'd like to turn it into a "bash Republicans" thread. It's about a filthy human with an overgrown, out of control yard. As I posted earlier, if you think it's alright, would it be alright for me to blast death metal at 750 decibels 24 hours a day? After all, why should we be concerned with what someone does in the neighborhood if it's not our own house?

That sound would affect my quality of life within the walls of my house. What a person grows in their own yard does not affect the quality of life I have in the walls of my house. Not at all comparable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2014, 09:15 AM
 
3,433 posts, read 5,746,404 times
Reputation: 5471
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbex View Post
No, it quite obvious from this thread that everyone should have exactly the same house painted the same color and pattern, same yard designed and landscaped the same way, same vehicles in the driveway, and same 2.5 children as everyone else.

It's funny...we so frequently hear about promoting tolerance and diversity, but as soon as someone does something diverse, everyone wants to rain hellfire on his parade.
yes, I guess you could call creating an eyesore in the neighborhood as........."something diverse ".

I will just call a spade a spade and say it is an eyesore that certainly brings down the value of houses in that neighborhood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Vermont
5,439 posts, read 16,860,945 times
Reputation: 2651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Natural...haha.......there's no place in Florida or anywhere else I know of in this country whre broccoli, bananas, loofa sponges, and beauty berries and watermelons just pop up naturally.

You have to put them there. Also, I would be really surprised if Mr. Laws "garden" doesn't require as much irrigation as a lawn in order to produce fruit/vegetables. You cant grow stuff like that in Florida without water.

you know that it rains almost every day in florida right?

i know my parents never irrigate. it's just not necessary and their grass is pretty lush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 09:35 AM
 
Location: SWUS
5,419 posts, read 9,196,333 times
Reputation: 5851
Quote:
Originally Posted by bumpus7 View Post
.
The man's rough junky looking garden, does rundown
all of the property values in the neighborhood.

.
Why do you believe you have a right to having a high property value? You did not buy his parcel of land.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johngolf View Post
I agree. He has little concern for those around him.
You're right. He has little concern for those around him. The difference is that he probably isn't throwing a hissy fit over someone else's yard, and probably keeps his nose out of his neighbors' business.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
His "garden" is a nasty mess and is an eyesore, IMO.

I would not want that mess next to my house.

I wouldn't have a problem with a garden that was neat and well tended.....perhaps with a flower border around the edges, etc.

Some CD members have posted pictures of beautiful gardens that I wouldn't mind seeing in a front yard.
What would you do? It's HIS yard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
Wrong, if you live in a community. If you want to live in a bunker in the middle of nowhere, by all means, go nuts (although to live in a bunker in the middle of nowhere, you're probably already nearing your "nuts" destination). When people live in close proximity to one another, what they do affects other people. So, based on your logic, I should be able to paint giant swastikas in bright orange paint all over the exterior of my house? Should I be able to put up giant billboards on my property on every side? How about blasting death metal 24 hours a day through massive Marshall stacks placed facing out?

No? Ok then.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes, though I somehow doubt there are many people willing to spend the money on that sort of thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
That sound would affect my quality of life within the walls of my house. What a person grows in their own yard does not affect the quality of life I have in the walls of my house. Not at all comparable.
This, I think, is what people are missing. It doesn't affect their lives in any other way than they drive by it or see it for the 30 seconds it takes them to get inside their car or their house.

If he broke the law, that is one thing... but $130,000 in fines is not only excessive, it's ridiculous. That, and saying "if someone wants to be a farmer, move to a farm or ranch" or something similar is not only ridiculous, it's rather rude. That'd be like me telling you to go move to a larger city so you could be a rude city dweller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 09:57 AM
 
3,433 posts, read 5,746,404 times
Reputation: 5471
glad he doesn't live near me !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 10:05 AM
 
5,075 posts, read 11,074,084 times
Reputation: 4669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
Pretty sure politics are not in play in this situation, as much as you'd like to turn it into a "bash Republicans" thread. It's about a filthy human with an overgrown, out of control yard. As I posted earlier, if you think it's alright, would it be alright for me to blast death metal at 750 decibels 24 hours a day? After all, why should we be concerned with what someone does in the neighborhood if it's not our own house?
The intent wasn't to bash, but to point out the apparent irony in buying a home in a heavily republican area and finding out after the fact that your neighbors (and local government) are a bunch of busybodies intent on controlling how an individual uses their private property.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy52 View Post
yes, I guess you could call creating an eyesore in the neighborhood as........."something diverse ".

I will just call a spade a spade and say it is an eyesore that certainly brings down the value of houses in that neighborhood.
While I'm sure this is true, the neighborhood in question seems to have other much more severe problems affecting house values, namely the hundreds of houses in foreclosure. Fining a person who's actually inhabiting their house and paying taxes on it, albeit with a messy yard, is like putting a bandaid on a severed artery. If they were really interested in fining the people for bringing down property values they'd go after the people abandoning homes before tackling the messy yard issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 10:19 AM
 
892 posts, read 1,499,892 times
Reputation: 1870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy52 View Post
yes, I guess you could call creating an eyesore in the neighborhood as........."something diverse ".

I will just call a spade a spade and say it is an eyesore that certainly brings down the value of houses in that neighborhood.

I've seen this argument get tossed around in my neighborhood as well. One neighbor DARED to paint his house a lovely shade of blue, that contrasts very well with the sea of bland off white houses around him. Many people complained up a storm that he was destroying their property values.

Another neighbor parked his brand new ski boat in his driveway. One made a mailbox that looked like a bird house. One planted trees in his front yard, instead of the cacti and palms that everyone else had. One paved his driveway wider, instead of having a gravel driveway next to the paved section. One extended his 2 foot tall block wall to the sidewalk. I've had complaints about my vintage trucks, apparently they don't blend well with the sea of work trucks and Kias.

All with the same cry - "They're destroying our property values!!!!!", and more often than not, coming from the same group of half a dozen or so residents that don't even live on the same street, much less are actual "neighbors".

Some people just won't be happy until we're all living the exact same life that they are....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 11:35 AM
 
1,275 posts, read 1,932,543 times
Reputation: 3444
I can see both sides of the coin. However, I am becoming more and more of the mind that even suburban dwellers should consider growing more of their own food. Afterall--all I hear anymore is how worried people are about GMOs and the "fake" food produced by "big ag" corporations. It will take a HUGE mindset change, but the more deplete of nutrients our food from big commercial outfits become, the more I think we have to take matters into our own hands. If you have land, use it for growing something to eat. Perhaps the days of perfectly manicured, homogeneous lawns that are "approved" by neighbors are over--and perhaps they should be. I feel the same about golf courses---they should be made into community gardens and low-income "green" housing with open land to grow food, too. But I do admit my ideas are much more radical than the average bear.

What is outragesous is the fine. I realize that amount has built up over a few years--and the fines keep piling up. But he is growing food, not committing a crime against humanity for pete's sake! It galls me that corporations can get away with environmental atrocities every day of the week without fines, and a regular dude like this gets slapped with fines for growing food. Bizarro world, I tell ya!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 11:49 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 5,451,961 times
Reputation: 3872
I'm in California, so overgrown vegetation wouldn't fly for a particular reason: fire hazard. The city would eventually rip it out and bill me. Florida's climate is different, of course, but I think it's reasonable to expect your neighbors to maintain their homes at least to a minimum of care. Isn't there a common sense balance between personal boundaries and communal responsibility? Isn't that what we strive for to reach adulthood?

A fence would be a start. That property is huge; there's no losing sunlight for the entire yard unless the fence is 50' tall and, besides, let nature decide what will grow in 6' of afternoon shade! Again, I say he's not gardening but accidentally discovering food. It's hardly laudable, definitely not husbandry or intentional subsistence gardening of any kind since he's yielding less than if he'd put some effort into it. "Hey, look what I found! I'm brilliant!"

Although ugly is in the eye of the beholder, sloth is obvious. Just clear the weeds! Is he eating the weeds? If not, can he defend their benefit beside their being "what nature does"? Nature calls, but we don't just take a dump in our front yards. We have neighbors. We're free to be vain and faux-deep but we have to look beyond ourselves too, or find a community that doesn't care how we express our vanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 01:17 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,439,510 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe moving View Post
you know that it rains almost every day in florida right?

i know my parents never irrigate. it's just not necessary and their grass is pretty lush.
It does not rain in that part of Florida almost every day. That is untrue. They had a very rainy summer, but in fact they are down on rainfall for the year. Just last week the Orlando Sentinel had articles about potential drought. Whether that's alarmist reporting, I don't know; however, the area has had drought issues or near drought issues for a while.

The area has frequent burn bans due to lack of rain as well as water restrictions. There are wild fires at least a few times a year due to lack of rain.

Sometimes it rains 5 minutes a day for days on end, sometimes it storms, sometimes theres no rain for 1-2 weeks. The end result is usually sufficient for established lawns/landscaping to survive.

You would have to be extremely lucky imo to grow a vegetable garden without backup irrigation. I have never heard of anyone able to grow vegetables without watering. I didn't hear Mr. Law say anything about his garden conserving water. Would think he'd be touting it if it were true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Garden

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top