Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2010, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,139,756 times
Reputation: 5860

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerntraveler View Post
How many 8th cousins or 7th cousins once removed does the average person has because Ive only tracked down one and I would like to track down long-lost family.My 8th cousin was related to my grandfathers stepmom who was the mother of my Papas half-brother.My papa's half brother was John Roe Ivanhoe who was a prominant dentist in either the New Orleans or Atlanta areas.I know he went to dental school in New Orleans but I never got to meet him.I'm an Ivanhoe.
Well, if you presumed an average of 4 children per family per generation -- (which is just a guess at an average) in the generation of 8th cousins, there would be 393,216 descendants of your common ancestor. Of those, one-fourth (or 65,536) would be 8th cousins. The other three-fourths would be closer cousins, or siblings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2011, 03:43 PM
 
356 posts, read 833,950 times
Reputation: 290
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
Well, if you presumed an average of 4 children per family per generation -- (which is just a guess at an average) in the generation of 8th cousins, there would be 393,216 descendants of your common ancestor. Of those, one-fourth (or 65,536) would be 8th cousins. The other three-fourths would be closer cousins, or siblings.

I think it's actually (196,608 - 1) = 196,607 8th cousins. At least from my math at 4 kids/person, b/c while 4^8 = 65,536, that only takes you back to 7th cousins, so you must multiply that # by 3 (ignoring the one person you are descended from).

And that's just from one ancestor. If you include all 256 couples you're descended from 9 generations back (1st=parents, 2nd=grandparents, etc), you get a grand total of (50,331,648 - 1) = 50,331,647, or approximately 16.2% of the US population and 0.7% of the current world population. The -1 btw, is so you don't count yourself.

Now, obviously not all of your ancestors had 4 living children who each had 4 living children, etc, not to mention there is a very real chance that some of your 8th cousins are "doubly 8th" or more related to you. Especially in small towns, perhaps you both are descended from 2-sets of the same 9th generation relatives. Doesn't mean there was any inbreeding, just that at some point perhaps two brothers married two sisters, which happened quite often.

Presumably your true # of 8th cousins is much less than that.

9-generations removed, at an average 30-yr generation, takes you back 270 years before you were born. So, if you were born abt 1950, approximately back to 1680.

For perspective, in 1650 there were only about 500 million people in the world. Today there are 6.9 billion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top