Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2011, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Dalton Gardens
2,852 posts, read 6,482,423 times
Reputation: 1700

Advertisements

Shame! SHAME on all of the sneaky scoundrels who hid from the census takers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:08 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,886,893 times
Reputation: 22699
I also think the census takers with "creative spelling" and poor handwriting should be ashamed of themselves. How many of us have hit roadblocks in our research because of these yahoos?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Dalton Gardens
2,852 posts, read 6,482,423 times
Reputation: 1700
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracySam View Post
I also think the census takers with "creative spelling" and poor handwriting should be ashamed of themselves. How many of us have hit roadblocks in our research because of these yahoos?
Oh, how true! I've seen an Edward be turned into an Edwina, an Elmer changed to Elmo and Amos recorded as Amoses!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:21 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,886,893 times
Reputation: 22699
I'm stuck because my Nicholson family line was somehow recorded as "Nickerson" in the early 1800s, due to the spelling and handwriting of a census taker. Shame on that dude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:42 PM
 
23 posts, read 176,535 times
Reputation: 34
Default This intrigues me

I find this most intriguing:


www.youtube.com/watch?v=gztX9fWPEvQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:44 PM
 
29 posts, read 43,888 times
Reputation: 32
I thought I would jump into this. I have a couple of interesting ones. All the stories I had about my great great grandfather was that he died when his boys were early teenagers then mom remarried. The sons didn't get along with the step-father and moved out young. Found a 1900 census record for him saying his name was J B Stockton born in 1844 in Ohio. My great grandfather was born in 1894 in Kansas so I kept digging. I kept finding infomation about a Lt J B Stockton from Kansas in the beginning of the civil war but I couldn't believe it was him because a 16 year old wasn't going to be made an officer. I found more records that this Lt Stockton became a Captain, so even less chance of it being my ancestor. Then I found some Kansas birth records detailing my great grandfather and his two brothers. Two of them mentioned the father as Job B Stockton and the third mentioned Col Stockton. In this documentation, the ages of father and mother didn't stay consistent. This also meant that Lt Stockton was probably my ancestor. So what about his age? Well I found an 1860 census record saying he was born in 1836. His wife was born in 1870, so great great grandad was fibbing a bit on his age to marry his 16 year old bride in 1886. Way to go Job .

Another interesting one was the father of Issac William Riddle. My grandmother had a book that stopped at Issac. The detailed information in the book made me wonder why it stopped abruptly there. Then I found some information that said that family tradition had him being hanged by the British in the Revolutionary War. Well, if you had this information wouldn't you want it in the book, then I found some more information. He wasn't hanged by the British, he was hanged by Gen Cleavland, for being a tory raider. Now I know why the family might have wanted to prune the tree information.

Last edited by stormbow; 03-04-2011 at 02:17 PM.. Reason: grammar and spelling - I know better, but apparently my fingers don't
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Dalton Gardens
2,852 posts, read 6,482,423 times
Reputation: 1700
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracySam View Post
I'm stuck because my Nicholson family line was somehow recorded as "Nickerson" in the early 1800s, due to the spelling and handwriting of a census taker. Shame on that dude.
Please tell me that this family line has at least one unique first name to use as a search guide? I hate when this happens to a surname so you have to revert to searching by first names and probably birth years, and ALL the names are common, like Mary, Elizabeth, John and Thomas!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:52 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,886,893 times
Reputation: 22699
Well, the one I'm really trying to find info on had the first name of Nehemiah. So you wouldn't think it would be hard.

Unfortunately, there was an actual Nickerson line in NJ, and they had a bunch of Nehemiahs. My Nicholson line had a couple of Nehemiahs, and at some point, the records get so fuzzy, they get mixed up. Especially when my Nehemiah Nicholson married a woman in the same year that Nehemiah Nicherson married a woman, with a very similar name. Didn't they think of their descendants when they made these awful decisions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Dalton Gardens
2,852 posts, read 6,482,423 times
Reputation: 1700
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormbow View Post
I thought I would jump into this. I have a couple of interesting ones. All the stories I had about my great great grandfather was that he died when his boys were early teenagers then mom remarried. The sons didn't get along with the step-father and moved out young. Found a 1900 census record for him saying his name was J B Stockton born in 1844 in Ohio. My great grandfather was born in 1894 in Kansas so I kept digging. I kept finding infomation about a Lt J B Stockton from Kansas in the beginning of the civil war but I couldn't beleive it was him because a 16 year old wasn't going to be made a officer. I found more records that this Lt Stockton became a Captain, so even less chance of it being my ancestor. Then I found some Kansas birth records detailing my great grandfather and his two brothers. Two of them mentioned the father as Job B Stockton and the third mentioned Col Stockton. In this documentation, the ages of father and mother didn't stay consistent. This also meant that Lt Stockton was probably my ancestor. So what about his age? Well I found an 1860 census record saying he was born in 1836. His wife was born in 1870, so great great grandad was fibbing a bit on his age to marry his 16 year old bride in 1886. Way to go Job .

Another interesting one was the father of Issac William Riddle. My grandmother had a book that stopped at Issac. The detailed information in the book made me wonder why it stopped abruptly there. Then I found some information that said that family tradition had him being hanged by the Brittish in the Revolutionary War. Well, if you had this information wouldn't you want it in the book, then I found some more information. He wasn't hanged by the Brittish, he was hanged by Gen Cleavland, for being a tory raider. Now I know why the family might have wanted to prune the tree information.
Yes, our ancestors often has amusing little tricks up their sleeves, LOL! As for the Tory raider, I think a few families had sons who fought on opposite sides and the only reason shame was attached was because the Tories lost. Had they won he would have been considered a hero. One of my South New Jersey ancestors was still selling British tea, and my other ancestors in the same town were part of the posse who busted down his door and gave him a hiding, LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 01:53 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,886,893 times
Reputation: 22699
Cyanna, you're looking at ancestors in South Jersey? You migth have some of the came idiot census takers I have!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top