Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If this is old, just ignore it, but it's news to me. 1.8 million year old skulls, buried together, with different physical appearances, suggesting an intermingling or evolution only within a species, not a phyla.
We know homo erectus was the first explorer, spreading north ane west and east. Remains of Erectus have been found dating all the way into true modern humans in isolated islands. It makes perfect sense that individuals would not always be the same. As they moved on from their origions, the chances of different characteristis are even greater.
Finding full skulls is so rare that this is an extraordinary find no matter what else it yields.
We know homo erectus was the first explorer, spreading north ane west and east. Remains of Erectus have been found dating all the way into true modern humans in isolated islands. It makes perfect sense that individuals would not always be the same. As they moved on from their origions, the chances of different characteristis are even greater.
Finding full skulls is so rare that this is an extraordinary find no matter what else it yields.
the problem with the paleo record is that its less than 0.000000000000000001% complete, a new discovery = new theories and the death of old ones. its great getting clues or glimpses into early evolutionary chains, its like time travel...but its not very conclusive
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.