Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2015, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Niagara Region
1,376 posts, read 2,167,237 times
Reputation: 4847

Advertisements

This is something I've seen twice this week while looking at others' family trees on Ancestry. A large family in 1740 living in a small farming community in, for example, Sussex, England. They have 12 children, born 9 or 10 months apart... 11 of whom are born in this same small village. Then you start reading through all the children's names and you see that the fifth child is amazingly born in New York, USA.


And worse, people have copied this tree.


Would love to hear what others have seen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2015, 03:18 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,126 times
Reputation: 4010
The worst part to me is when people use as a source "so and so tree @ Ancestry"

SO MANY of the trees on there are undocumented, and using an undocumented tree as a "source" just leads to further perpetuation of the many mistakes that are invariably going to be there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 04:46 PM
 
9,694 posts, read 7,396,690 times
Reputation: 9931
all the family died in cape horn in 1600, they have never been to cape horn, but its been copied a 1000 times,

my favorite on anchestry is when i get all these hints, 20, 30 of them, but there all from my tree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 04:55 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,655 posts, read 28,697,006 times
Reputation: 50536
Ancestry has perpetuated the myth that genealogy is easy and simple. Their ads tell people to just flip that little green leaf over and-----Oh! I found my entire family!

They're just after the money so what do they care about accuracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Australia
8,394 posts, read 3,489,116 times
Reputation: 40368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vectoris View Post
This is something I've seen twice this week while looking at others' family trees on Ancestry. A large family in 1740 living in a small farming community in, for example, Sussex, England. They have 12 children, born 9 or 10 months apart... 11 of whom are born in this same small village. Then you start reading through all the children's names and you see that the fifth child is amazingly born in New York, USA.


And worse, people have copied this tree.


Would love to hear what others have seen.

Yup, I found something similar. An ancestor of mine who had allegedly sailed from England to America in 165X with his wife and small child, then had a dozen or so more children, one born every 12-18 months. Each alternate child was born in England!

Maybe they were collecting the 17th century version of frequent-flyer points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma USA
1,194 posts, read 1,100,868 times
Reputation: 4419
Somebody must have clicked a wrong button, and I now have a g-g-g---- uncle who died in Essex, Somalia.

No. He died like his parents, siblings, and offspring in Essex, England.

Fat fingers on the drop-down transported him via pirate ship to the Horn of Africa.

And dozens of family trees show the same mistake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma USA
1,194 posts, read 1,100,868 times
Reputation: 4419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobber View Post
Yup, I found something similar. An ancestor of mine who had allegedly sailed from England to America in 165X with his wife and small child, then had a dozen or so more children, one born every 12-18 months. Each alternate child was born in England!

Maybe they were collecting the 17th century version of frequent-flyer points.

I've got some of those too.

One in particular, all siblings but one were born in Ulster, Northern Ireland, the middle sibling in Kentucky in 1635.

Kentucky didn't even exist in 1635.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 05:58 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,655 posts, read 28,697,006 times
Reputation: 50536
First time I went on Ancestry I found my American grandfather died in Canada. Funny, that was the first I heard of it. My aunt had described how her mother had been quieting the baby and went into the bedroom and my grandfather had passed away in his sleep, early morning. Right in the city where they lived, in his own home, in his own bed--which was in the good old USA.

I was mad. I messaged the person who had that tree and practically demanded that she take that totally wrong information off. That was a few years ago and I guess if it happened today when I am so used to Ancestry mistakes, I would let it roll like water off a duck's back. But it gets sort of personal when it is someone relatively recent like your own grandfather. (I hope I never do that to anyone.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 07:28 PM
 
4,993 posts, read 5,294,120 times
Reputation: 15763
I don't have Ancestry, but my favorite has been searches on my name and family. I started researching pretty young and collected Info and shared it with my aunts. They shared it with their first cousin. Now I'm married to my father, my name is misspelled and the birth dates are wrong. I'm alive. Why is my info posted anyway? My info was for internal use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Not Weird, Just Mildly Interesting
416 posts, read 588,745 times
Reputation: 636
Ugh, the lack of sourcing drives me batty. I see errors and carelessness all over the place.

I took both of my trees private because I'm not interested in correcting bad info for lazy people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top