Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2010, 07:38 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,106 posts, read 13,124,520 times
Reputation: 10062

Advertisements

If you could remove the automobiles, large parts of Brooklyn would look straight out of the late nineteenth century. There are large historic districts; Brooklyn Heights, Park Slope, Fort Greene etc. and quite a few colonial buildings left.

Having said that, parts of Brooklyn like Williamsburg and Sunset Park have been loosing alot of their history due to the explosion of the often ugly "Fedders buildings" being built today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2010, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
3,844 posts, read 9,246,027 times
Reputation: 1645
Quote:
Originally Posted by alleghenyangel View Post
I've been compiling a list of well-preserved cities. It seems that most cities have experienced a lot of urban destruction over the years. Here are some that seem to have escaped it, for the most part (please correct me if I am wrong).

Savannah, GA (was not burned in the Civil War, was protected from 1950s urban renewal by concerned citizens)

Butte, MT (seems to be a mostly intact old west boom town).

Wheeling, WV (seems largely intact, but surviving historic structures are threatened by lack of investment and bad economy, which leads to abandonment, etc.)

York, PA (seems largely intact)

Jackson, MI (very beautiful downtown, seems intact)

Grand Rapids, MI (not sure on this one, but seems more or less historically intact).

Wichita, KS (any thoughts on this one?)

Lincoln, NE

Portland, Maine

Providence, RI

Feel free to add or subtract cities based on your personal knowledge!
Charleston, SC ...seriously.

At least Downtown. I was blown away when I visited.




Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 02:34 PM
 
1 posts, read 2,081 times
Reputation: 10
I found this thread looking up cities where i could visit that had much more 19th cent buildings than my city of Minneapolis. When you see how beautiful MPLS was then, it is enough to make you sick what has happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Portland, Maine
4,180 posts, read 14,548,584 times
Reputation: 1673
No one has mentioned Baltimore is this mix. It has a pretty good record of restoration and renewel versus clearance. There are many neighborhoods that look pretty similar to 100-200 years ago. The fact that Baltimore has not cleared out some of it's more depressing areas in hopes of a comeback is actually criticized quite often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 03:10 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,702,913 times
Reputation: 7975
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryson662001 View Post
Which period of history are you interested in? Amongst the very large cities....Philly still has a large area of 18th century and colonial housing stock in the Society Hill and Queen Village neighborhoods in spite of urban renewal. Also the Georgetown neighborhood in D.C. has quite a bit from that era or at least early 19th century.

I used to live on Queen Street in QV - the 100 block - great rowhome built in the 1790s, it had an addition but I am convinced the insulation was colonial period - my gas bill was insane in the winter
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 09:21 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,555,149 times
Reputation: 693
I believe Philadelphia has the most 18th century buildings of any US city. Philadelphia has really really old housing stock. There have been plenty of new, often wrong-headed, building projects, but they've been mainly as pockets within denser neighborhoods. Really what happened in Philadelphia wasn't wholesale demolition, but abandonment. Once people fled to the suburbs in the 70s huge swaths of North and West Philadelphia just became essentially vacant, and so you have today blocks where everything has been torn down simply due to decay. It really is heartbreaking to see that kind of neglect. The highways, when they came through Philly, stuck to industrial corridors. Although it cuts the city off from the water now, where the highway is used to be generally warehouses, so not much residential area was actually torn down. Aesthetically, it still looks bad. But the docks are abandoned for the most part now since the introduction of container ships anyway. Yes, a better approach should have been taken when dealing with this, but then again, the ideas floating around back then for "urban renewal" were essentially unurban.

Don't get me started on the Richard Allen Homes though, now that is a black eye on Philadelphia's urban fabric. It's basically been Philadelphia's proving ground for bad urban renewal ideas. It started I believe in the 1940s or 50s, as with the ideas of every other renewal project of the time. I think its first incarnation was housing blocks in a large green space. Then it was knocked down and rebuilt as suburban tract houses. Basically, whatever idea is in vogue has dictated what was built there. Maybe soon we'll see it turned back to rowhouses, as has happened elsewhere like around the 13th and Bainbridge area. The same level of density isn't achieved because back alleys front on backyards and parking spaces rather than houses, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.

Last edited by Marius Pontmercy; 01-05-2011 at 09:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
1,973 posts, read 5,190,552 times
Reputation: 1940
What about Portland, ME?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2011, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,316 posts, read 120,219,944 times
Reputation: 35920
Lincoln-frickin' Nebraska? Please explain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2011, 04:21 AM
 
Location: New Hampshire
2,257 posts, read 8,137,138 times
Reputation: 4108
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5Lakes View Post
What about Portland, ME?
Portland is fairly well-preserved, particularly the Old Port, although much of the city was destroyed by fire in 1866, so you'll find less pre-Victorian architecture than you'd expect in a New England city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2011, 04:41 AM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,243 posts, read 7,140,320 times
Reputation: 3014
Of the places Ive been it seems the smaller US cities fared the best. Troy NY and Scranton PA seem to be pretty intact ,apparently survived the Urban Renewal era without wholesale removal of neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top