Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2011, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Clovis Strong, NM
3,376 posts, read 6,104,585 times
Reputation: 2031

Advertisements

Seems like CA and FL un-doings are the atypical housing and unemployment issues.
Everywhere else on the list seems to be mainly crime.

The way I see it, they need to be a little more specific about what crime and whom it is inflicted upon.
If it's two separate gangs or drug-lords spending brass on each other, then that's something I wouldn't be too concerned about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2011, 10:05 PM
 
1,495 posts, read 2,299,695 times
Reputation: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
I think they're flawed, but why do Forbes lists seem to get so much anger/criticism on this site? Even lists that are based on the subjective opinion of a select group seem to get less criticism than Forbes, so that makes me think "Forbes' methodology is flawed" is not really the explanation. That it's something else.

Is it that Forbes has a different view of what qualifies as "good" or "bad" in cities/towns than you do? I know they seem to value population growth, low unemployment, and low crime. People here seem to value population density, public transportation, "color", and other aesthetics. They might be looking more at people with money and children. You guys often seem to be looking more at what's good for single or divorced people. Is it something like that? Or is it just that they have so many dang ads to get to their page.

Addendum: I'm not a sportsperson so I might agree with you on their list this time. I couldn't care less if a town has no good teams.
Their regional and political biases make for predictable lists that don't seem all that informative.

And, as you mentioned, the sports angle is just dumb. No matter how big a fan you are, that's no way to measure a city. Maybe that's meant to be a joke; if so, I didn't catch it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 06:55 AM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,066 posts, read 21,138,178 times
Reputation: 43616
They need to combine that slide show with this this one. The 10 Happiest Cities To Work In America - Forbes.com
They could just call it "Great places to work, but you wouldn't want to live there"

Places that made both list: Memphis, Jacksonville, DC, and Miami
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 07:01 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubbleT View Post
They need to combine that slide show with this this one. The 10 Happiest Cities To Work In America - Forbes.com
They could just call it "Great places to work, but you wouldn't want to live there"

Places that made both list: Memphis, Jacksonville, DC, and Miami
Well maybe a new list for these, most bipolar

Just kind of shows that forbes is interesting but maybe not really relevant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 01:09 PM
 
1,591 posts, read 3,426,865 times
Reputation: 2157
wow, looks like that actually got it right for once
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 07:27 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,519,162 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubbleT View Post
They need to combine that slide show with this this one. The 10 Happiest Cities To Work In America - Forbes.com
They could just call it "Great places to work, but you wouldn't want to live there"

Places that made both list: Memphis, Jacksonville, DC, and Miami
So apprently those are great places to work, but you'll be a miserable angry bastard on your commute and when you get home...

Okay, Forbes...you might want to start doublechecking what cities you're throwing on your lists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2011, 10:28 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,749 posts, read 23,813,296 times
Reputation: 14660
I can't stand those Forbes polls, they are so stupid and baseless. As if a major league sports team were not winning in my hometown would somehow compromise my quality of life. OK, whatever. It might be an amusing read if they polled how many people are using anti-depressants per capita in these cities, but even that wouldn't hold water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top