Maybe I didn't explain/word it very well last night, so let me try again. And no personal animosity intended, even if it may have come across that way...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQalex
I don't get any of this. Aren't you one of the ones who champion the notion that Texas and Oklahoma are not part of the modern-day Southwest but rather the South? (Or rather, the "South Central" United States, as that poster and also you now have described it).
|
Absolutely correct, and it appears now I must have misread what you were saying. The way it came across to me was
you were disputing such. But ok, let's just chalk that one up to a mis-understanding, agreed? Given that misunderstanding, what I was clarifying, in fact, was that Texas and Oklahoma are Southwestern in a different sense as are New Mexico and Arizona (Western South or South central for the former and southern West for the latter). You didn't say originally where you were from, so I didn't know. My mistake and apology on that particular point.
Quote:
So I guess in order to make some sort of 'point' that "you guys" isn't all that common in the "Southwest" you're now wiling to lump them back into a region with Arizona and New Mexico??
|
See above. Like I say, I misunderstood your application and rationale.
Quote:
But all that is immaterial to what I was getting at in replying to that poster who replied to me. My point was that where I live "you guys" in referring to females is common usage and widely understood. And that we're not calling females males since we understand (and the dictionary agrees) that "guys" can refer to females as well.
|
I don't know where it has been disagreed that "you guys" is not acceptable as fine to use if one wants to use it...or is saying one if literally referring to females as males. The whole issue -- as to the thread topic -- as far as I am concerned is not
that nor with, per se, those who use it. Rather, with those definite sect of northerners who ridicule we Southerners for "y"all" being improper...yet seemingly never examine all the implications of their own idiom.
Quote:
I really have no idea why you use posts I make in order to advance this whole North-South rivalry/fight that you seem to have going in your mind and are playing out in this thread. Again, I am not a Northerner.
|
Again, see above. Seems like this is an invention in your mind as to an assignment of regional animosities.
Quote:
And besides, I haven't said anything in this thread about the usage of "y'all" and whether or not it's correct or indicitave of one's level of intelligence to use it.
|
Who said you did? But clearly, others have. And if you don't see it, then you haven't looked very hard.
They are the ones I have the issue with.
Quote:
The whole reason I've posted much at all in this thread is to counteract the notion that the use of "you guys" when referring to females is wrong in any way. It's not.
|
In terms of gender, it actually does contain a contradiction.
Of course -- and I have said so repeatedly -- it is not wrong at all as idiom. It is well-entrenched in American usage in most parts of the country. Hell, my own kids -- who mostly grew up in the North after their mother and I divorced -- use it (although when they visit down here they seem to naturally gravitate back to "y'all...which, being born in Texas and growing up here in the formative years, is their "cradle language." ).
Regardless though, I can't emphasize enough I have no personal problem in the least with "you guys" (except if my grandkids adopt it..BWHAHAHA). But seriously, I can honestly say I would have never gotten so testy about it at all if it had not been for that some yankees presuming to ridicule Southerners as coming across as "white trash" or "ignorant" or "redneck" or "backwards" for using "y'all" as the generic term for another group of people. If you really want to focus on hostitlity and regional animosities? THEY are the bunch that should be examined, wouldn't you say?
I think what many of us are pointing out -- in response to a lot of disdain and provocation -- is that many of
that ilk need to closer examine
their own arguments and reasoning.
I hope that clarifies things, somewhat!