Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2011, 12:11 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398

Advertisements

Per capita income (2000)
$54,755 - San Jose
$49,652 - San Francisco/Oakland
$41,931 - Boston
$41,372 - Washington DC
$39,797 - New York
$38,576 - Seattle
$38,382 - Denver
$37,383 - Minneapolis/St. Paul
$37,335 - Hartford
$35,390 - Chicago

$34,756 - Raleigh
$34,440 - Philadelphia
$34,185 - Houston
$34,152 - Dallas/Fort Worth
$33,808 - San Diego
$33,759 - Atlanta
$33,720 - Detroit
$33,657 - Baltimore
$33,245 - Milwaukee
$33,218 - Charlotte

$32,779 - Portland
$32,740 - Austin
$32,487 - Indianapolis
$32,342 - Kansas City
$32,172 - Cleveland
$31,815 - Los Angeles
$31,784 - Miami
$31,746 - St. Louis
$31,662 - Nashville
$31,469 - Columbus

$31,097 - Cincinnati
$31,073 - Sacramento
$30,910 - Pittsburgh
$30,892 - Richmond
$30,162 - Las Vegas
$30,138 - Jacksonville
$29,720 - Louisville
$29,192 - Tampa/St. Petersburg
$29,102 - Memphis
$29,094 - Rochester

$28,909 - Phoenix
$29,256 - Providence
$28,976 - Birmingham
$28,654 - Salt Lake City
$27,758 - Orlando
$27,074 - Buffalo
$26,949 - New Orleans
$26,865 - San Antonio
$26,848 - Oklahoma City
$26,762 - Virginia Beach/Norfolk

$23,526 - Riverside/San Bernardino

Per capita income (2009)
$59,993 - San Francisco/Oakland
$56,984 - Washington DC
$55,169 - San Jose
$53,553 - Boston
$52,037 - New York
$50,675 - Hartford
$50,378 - Seattle
$48,201 - Baltimore
$46,611 - Denver
$46,570 - Houston

$46,075 - Philadelphia
$45,811 - Minneapolis/St. Paul
$45,706 - San Diego
$44,379 - Chicago
$42,784 - Los Angeles
$42,764 - Miami
$42,705 - New Orleans
$42,303 - Milwaukee
$42,298 - Pittsburgh
$41,764 - Dallas/Fort Worth

$41,161 - Richmond
$40,829 - Providence
$40,728 - St. Louis
$40,438 - Kansas City
$40,306 - Sacramento
$39,518 - Virginia Beach/Norfolk
$39,451 - Cleveland
$39,376 - Jacksonville
$39,206 - Portland
$39,036 - Rochester

$38,742 - Oklahoma City
$38,656 - Nashville
$38,592 - Birmingham
$38,532 - Indianapolis
$38,034 - Charlotte
$38,007 - Raleigh
$37,999 - Columbus
$37,967 - Cincinnati
$37,927 - Detroit
$37,688 - Louisville

$37,632 - Tampa/St. Petersburg
$37,623 - Memphis
$37,544 - Austin
$37,500 - Salt Lake City
$37,469 - Buffalo
$37,101 - Atlanta
$36,285 - San Antonio
$36,711 - Las Vegas
$35,279 - Orlando
$34,452 - Phoenix

$29,680 - Riverside/San Bernardino

Percent change (2000-2009)
+58.5% - New Orleans
+47.7% - Virginia Beach/Norfolk
+44.3% - Oklahoma City
+43.2% - Baltimore
+39.6% - Providence
+38.4% - Buffalo
+37.7% - Washington DC
+36.8% - Pittsburgh
+36.2% - Houston
+35.7% - Hartford

+35.2% - San Diego
+35.1% - San Antonio
+34.5% - Miami*
+34.5% - Los Angeles*
+34.2% - Rochester
+33.8% - Philadelphia
+33.2% - Richmond*
+33.2% - Birmingham*
+30.9% - Salt Lake City
+30.8% - New York

+30.7% - Jacksonville
+30.6% - Seattle
+29.7% - Sacramento
+29.3% - Memphis
+28.9% - Tampa/St. Petersburg
+28.3% - St. Louis
+27.7% - Boston
+27.2% - Milwaukee
+27.1% - Orlando
+26.8% - Louisville

+26.2% - Riverside/San Bernardino
+25.4% - Chicago
+25.0% - Kansas City
+22.6% - Cleveland
+22.5% - Minneapolis/St. Paul
+22.3% - Dallas/Fort Worth
+22.1% - Cincinnati*
+22.1% - Nashville*
+21.7% - Las Vegas
+21.4% - Denver

+20.8% - San Francisco/Oakland*
+20.8% - Columbus*
+19.6% - Portland
+19.2% - Phoenix
+18.6% - Indianapolis
+14.7% - Austin
+14.5% - Charlotte
+12.5% - Detroit
+9.9% - Atlanta
+9.4% - Raleigh

+0.8% - San Jose

(*: Ties are broken by decimal points.)

Ranking change (2000-2009)
+30 - New Orleans
+24 - Virginia Beach/Norfolk
+20 - Providence
+18 - Oklahoma City
+16 - Orlando
+14 - Pittsburgh
+13 - Richmond
+11 - Los Angeles
+11 - Miami
+11 - Rochester

+10 - Baltimore
+10 - Birmingham
+8 - Jacksonville
+7 - Sacramento
+5 - St. Louis
+4 - San Diego
+3 - Hartford
+3 - Houston
+2 - Washington DC
+1 - Buffalo

+1 - Milwaukee
+1 - Philadelphia
+1 - San Antonio
+1 - San Francisco
0 - Kansas City
0 - New York
0 - Riverside/San Bernardino
0 - Salt Lake City
-1 - Boston
-1 - Seattle

-2 - Cleveland
-2 - Denver
-2 - San Jose
-3 - Louisville
-3 - Memphis
-3 - Nashville
-3 - Tampa/St. Petersburg
-4 - Chicago
-4 - Minneapolis/St. Paul
-6 - Dallas/Fort Worth

-7 - Cincinnati
-7 - Columbus
-8 - Portland
-9 - Phoenix
-11 - Indianapolis
-13 - Las Vegas
-15 - Charlotte
-21 - Austin
-22 - Detroit
-25 - Raleigh

-30 - Atlanta

Discuss. <-- source embedded here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2011, 04:33 AM
 
2,399 posts, read 4,216,762 times
Reputation: 1306
Atlanta fell down the list because every other joe without a job flocked here because of the "jobs", and because every other hoodrat thought that Atlanta "was da place to be". Compared to ten years ago, the region has a larger percentage of people who make less money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 05:34 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stars&StripesForever View Post
Atlanta fell down the list because every other joe without a job flocked here because of the "jobs", and because every other hoodrat thought that Atlanta "was da place to be". Compared to ten years ago, the region has a larger percentage of people who make less money.
I'd say Atlanta has become a victim of its own success, and it's further proof that reputation is the ultimate lagging indicator. The economy in Atlanta decelerated in the 2000's, yet people from all over the country kept moving there anyway like the economy was as good as it was in the 1990's. Not only did this suppress income growth, but its kept Atlanta's unemployment rate higher than the national average in the last few years. (Last I checked, it was still flirting with 10%.) At least the urban core seems to be densifying and maturing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 06:51 AM
 
93,257 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Is it me or is a metro like Rochester NY very underrated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 07:47 AM
 
Location: New Orleans
2,311 posts, read 4,945,820 times
Reputation: 1443
Hoody hoo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 09:02 AM
 
1,782 posts, read 2,085,170 times
Reputation: 1366
The change in Pittsburgh the past 10 years has been nothing less than amazing... going from near the bottom of the rust belt to leading the pack in per capita income. And to do it while being surrounded by an economically depressed region with no nearby growing metropolitan areas to leech off of.

This has pretty much been an entirely self-initiated turnaround.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 09:59 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Nice thread - interesting info!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365
Great to see Baltimore jump so high on the list. Very impressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 06:28 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,152,053 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by airwave09 View Post
The change in Pittsburgh the past 10 years has been nothing less than amazing... going from near the bottom of the rust belt to leading the pack in per capita income. And to do it while being surrounded by an economically depressed region with no nearby growing metropolitan areas to leech off of.

This has pretty much been an entirely self-initiated turnaround.
Pittsburghers that have stayed in the area are definately making a lot more money now than they did 10 years ago. The amount of wealthy people has also gone up a bit as the wealthy are no longer just in the 3 or 4 traditionally rich areas of the metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 09:32 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
Pittsburghers that have stayed in the area are definately making a lot more money now than they did 10 years ago. The amount of wealthy people has also gone up a bit as the wealthy are no longer just in the 3 or 4 traditionally rich areas of the metro.
It explains why the supply of $250K+ houses is tight, and why the northern suburbs are growing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top