Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2007, 12:43 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,146,737 times
Reputation: 29983

Advertisements

But would you call it Montoming or Wytana? And would Disney have to change the name of their popular tweener show to Hannah Wytana?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2007, 04:49 AM
 
151 posts, read 739,558 times
Reputation: 89
They should move the Florida panhandle to Alabama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 05:42 PM
 
1,869 posts, read 5,801,434 times
Reputation: 701
St. Louis is very different from the rest of Missouri.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 06:12 PM
 
Location: the best coast
718 posts, read 2,687,786 times
Reputation: 225
I agree splitting california from coast to inland sounds pretty wacky. Especially since california leads the nation in agriculture, which is located primarily in the central valley. Not only that but that would give "inland" california pretty much all the water and would leave the coasts dry. Not to mention there is not as much population inland.


Northern California and southern california have historically been at odds. Northern california had to deal with its natural land scape being altered to make water flow down south.

Congressmen from the north and south are always at odds over who should get what priorities. The north gave california boxer and pelosi, the south gave arnold and the duke and nixon and reagan.



California needs to be split right in two around montery and fresno.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs,CO
2,367 posts, read 7,651,531 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishtacos View Post
St. Louis is very different from the rest of Missouri.
I agree,I've driven through Missouri and the western and eastern parts seem different.Other than thier skylines St. Louis and KC looked much different from one another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Alabama!
6,048 posts, read 18,416,504 times
Reputation: 4835
Quote:
Originally Posted by TerrySRA View Post
They should move the Florida panhandle to Alabama.
We'll take it!
Sometimes I wish North Alabama would secede from south Alabama. Except we would want to keep Baldwin County (with Gulf Shores & Orange Beach)!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Burlington, VT
484 posts, read 1,944,175 times
Reputation: 267
Split Massachusetts down the Connecticut River. Name the Western portion "Berkshire" or "Arcadia". The capital can be Springfield.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Elkins, WV
1,981 posts, read 5,988,647 times
Reputation: 827
Culturally WV could be divided between northern WV and Southern WV. WV doesnt' really have a lot of land though, so that really wouldn't make a lot of sense creating states that small.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 08:42 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,760,061 times
Reputation: 1681
i wish the west virginia panhandle belonged to MD so MD would get bigger and not look so much like a huge pistol anymore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 08:45 PM
 
Location: C.R. K-T
6,202 posts, read 11,446,304 times
Reputation: 3809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrapin2212 View Post
....there's also a huge difference between the New Orleans area and the rest of Louisiana. The divide is not just urban-rural but religious as well with large Catholic populations in New Orleans because of the early French influences and the Protestants in the rest of the state. Also New Orleans is a more French/European culture compared to the Old South feel of the rest of Louisiana, including Baton Rouge and Shreveport.
That's the reason why the state capitol was move 100 km up the river to Baton Rouge. The Protestant legislators from upstate didn't feel comfortable in Catholic New Orleans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top