Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Inland Empire (Riverside and San Bernardino) of SoCal is the exurban/ suburban fringe of LA...it remains more affordable nonetheless extremelely nondescript and sprawling...However, demographically it is very diverse racially..and really alot of ppl exist within their own borders (they do not necessarily commute to neighboring LA/ OC)
Any other similar areas? (This is not as simple as saying "Any suburbia, USA" as there is actually over 2 million ppl living in the Inland Empire)
To Northern Californians, would you consider the South Bay as SF's (more progressive/ productive) "Inland Empire"?
The Inland Empire (Riverside and San Bernardino) of SoCal is the exurban/ suburban fringe of LA...it remains more affordable nonetheless extremelely nondescript and sprawling...However, demographically it is very diverse racially..and really alot of ppl exist within their own borders (they do not necessarily commute to neighboring LA/ OC)
Any other similar areas? (This is not as simple as saying "Any suburbia, USA" as there is actually over 2 million ppl living in the Inland Empire)
To Northern Californians, would you consider the South Bay as SF's (more progressive/ productive) "Inland Empire"?
Would these areas have to exist outside a major metropolitan area??
The Inland Empire (Riverside and San Bernardino) of SoCal is the exurban/ suburban fringe of LA...it remains more affordable nonetheless extremelely nondescript and sprawling...However, demographically it is very diverse racially..and really alot of ppl exist within their own borders (they do not necessarily commute to neighboring LA/ OC)
Any other similar areas? (This is not as simple as saying "Any suburbia, USA" as there is actually over 2 million ppl living in the Inland Empire)
To Northern Californians, would you consider the South Bay as SF's (more progressive/ productive) "Inland Empire"?
The Inland Empire (Riverside and San Bernardino) of SoCal is the exurban/ suburban fringe of LA...it remains more affordable nonetheless extremelely nondescript and sprawling...However, demographically it is very diverse racially..and really alot of ppl exist within their own borders (they do not necessarily commute to neighboring LA/ OC)
Any other similar areas? (This is not as simple as saying "Any suburbia, USA" as there is actually over 2 million ppl living in the Inland Empire)
To Northern Californians, would you consider the South Bay as SF's (more progressive/ productive) "Inland Empire"?
The Bay Area's version of the Inland Empire should be the far east bay. Contra Costa County area. Like Antioch, Brentwood, & Oakley. The two regions are practically like twins. Diverse population, no jobs, suburban sprawl, strip malls, lots of families. Seems to me the only difference is one is mountains and the other is desert.
There are a few states in the midwest than can be considered the nation's "inland empire" without the racial diversity
Cheap and depressed housing
Hillbillies and rednecks
Jesus, Guns and Meth
Stereotyping much?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.