Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:59 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,566 posts, read 28,665,617 times
Reputation: 25155

Advertisements

Good maps in posts #3 and #9. Virginia almost solidly roots for Washington, D.C. teams - especially NFL, NBA and NHL. Maryland is more divided because of Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Philly teams. It's interesting that the eastern part of North Carolina roots for D.C. teams as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2012, 10:14 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,904,705 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigre79 View Post
Not completely sure I understand what you're asking, but basically spectator sports seem to be less important to people here than things actually occurring in their lives (like hunting, fishing, camping, snowmachining, general stuff happening around town, etc.), in comparison with certain other places.

BTW, I'm originally from Azle, just northwest of Fort Worth.
I'll tell ya this, our fan base here in DFW may not be RABID as people in the Northeast or some Midwest cities, but we're more loyal to our teams than than most other cities in the U.S. and the area is often scene as one of the best sports cities in America.

But we do have several transplants here as well....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 11:13 PM
 
Location: Eastwatch by the sea
1,280 posts, read 1,858,292 times
Reputation: 1649
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnerTHB View Post
For MLB, Most of Arkansas and some of Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi support the St. Louis Cardinals.
Quoted for truth. In fact, their popularity is as far reaching as Southern and Central IL with older Black men in particular. I've heard lots of stories about the St. Louis Stars, a Negro League team. In fact, when it comes to baseball, Peoria, Il is divided into Cub fans and Cardinal fans! Of course, the Redbirds of Memphis are a minor league affiliated with the Cardinals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 11:30 PM
 
Location: Eastwatch by the sea
1,280 posts, read 1,858,292 times
Reputation: 1649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canes2006Champs View Post
I know a guy from Arkansas who tells me the Cowboys are big throughout most of the whole state. Which really isn't much of a surprise but worth noting.

I think the Braves are the most followed professional team in South Carolina. NFL wise I think most people who don't follow either the Falcons or the Panthers tend to root for teams that have former USC/Clemson guys on the roster.
I must agree here. Although, I'm judging from my time in the while I was stationed in Fairbanks, AK: 90-93. I use to love watching a Cub vs Braves game w/ my South Carolina buddies. They loved the Braves, for sure! Yes, we were able to watch those events way up in Fairbanks, AK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 01:43 AM
 
1,953 posts, read 3,878,032 times
Reputation: 1102
I've said it before on this forum and I'll say it again, I think professional sports team rep their city (and its metro), not any state. Flagship state schools rep their state. To me, names like the Texas Rangers, New Jersey Devils, and the Carolina Hurricanes are awful. The "Golden State" Warriors is an abomination. States are too big and culturally diverse to be represented by one team.

I'm willing to give a pass to the Patriots because Boston is for the most part seen as the undisputed cultural capital of New England. Same for the Minnesota teams regarding Minneapolis/St. Paul. But other than that, I disagree with the notion that states are more important to team territories than metros. The Commoncensus maps make that pretty clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
I've moved all over the country, and I've never rooted for the home team where I lived. In fact, I usually root against the home team, just to spite my friends who are only "fans" when the home team is winning, and ignore sports when they are not winning.

I have my favorite teams that I root for, and if I moved to Iowa or South Carolina or New Mexico, why on earth would that make me discontinue my allegiance?

I grew up in Wisconsin before the Braves moved in from Boston. Most people were Chicago Cubs fans, since we could hear their games on the radio (there was no TV). The Brooklyn Dodgers also had a large following.

People who automatically root for all their local sports teams seem so shallow to me, that I don't think too much about what motivates them. With their provincialism, they probably also think their local shopping mall and morning deejays are the best in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 10:27 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,904,705 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by soug View Post
I've said it before on this forum and I'll say it again, I think professional sports team rep their city (and its metro), not any state. Flagship state schools rep their state. To me, names like the Texas Rangers, New Jersey Devils, and the Carolina Hurricanes are awful. The "Golden State" Warriors is an abomination. States are too big and culturally diverse to be represented by one team.
NOTE:

Texas Rangers - named in honor of the historic law enforcement in the state.

Florida Panthers - named for the state's most dangerous predator, the Florida Panther

New Jersey Devils - Named after the legendary "Jersey Devil"

Those teams are named the way they are NOT to represent the entire state (well, Texas and Florida and not too much New Jersey in this case), they're named for special reasons.

As for a team represnting an entire state/region like New England, the Tennessee Titans, and all Carolina and Minnesota teams, what's wrong with that? By having just the name, it encompasses ALL of the state and their history/culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 12:52 PM
 
1,980 posts, read 3,772,677 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
People who automatically root for all their local sports teams seem so shallow to me, that I don't think too much about what motivates them. With their provincialism, they probably also think their local shopping mall and morning deejays are the best in the world.
I think the opposite. Straying from their local teams to jump on the fad bandwagon team of the day is what is shallow. Being able to attend home games, hear home broadcasts, and mingle with fellow fans totally trumps being the lone wolf fan a long way from home. The people I know who are fans of out of town teams, who aren't from there or do not have a family or personal connection to that area, do so to be different or combative among their peers. They are the bottom of the food chain in the sports fan world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 01:04 PM
 
1,980 posts, read 3,772,677 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by soug View Post
I've said it before on this forum and I'll say it again, I think professional sports team rep their city (and its metro), not any state.
They rep their fan bases. I consider their territory where ever their fan base is in the absolute majority. In some cases it encompasses entire states, in other cases multiple states, and in other cases just a fraction of a state and even metro area! It's fluid, as expansion, competition, demographic changes, etc. cause fan bases to ebb and grow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by soug View Post
I The "Golden State" Warriors is an abomination. .
The Philadelphia Warriors (and likewise the New York Giants) brought their name with them when they came to San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top