Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: 4th largest metro area by built-up geographic area
Atlanta 5 11.63%
Boston 1 2.33%
Dallas 11 25.58%
Detroit 0 0%
Houston 12 27.91%
Miami 1 2.33%
Philadelphia 5 11.63%
San Francisco Bay area 5 11.63%
Washington D.C. 3 6.98%
Other 0 0%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2013, 11:58 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,485,386 times
Reputation: 15184

Advertisements

If you want "spread out" go here:

List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

click on arrows under Land Area (twice to get descending). Los Angeles isn't in the top 3. It's New York, Sprawlanta, then Chicago. Los Angeles is #7. The urban areas of the Bay Area are listed separately, but you can add them up. San Francisco/Oakland + San Jose + Concord + Santa Rosa contains about 1012 square miles, #16 on the list between Seattle and Tampa but almost double the population of Seattle's urban area.

#4 on the list is Philly, so that's what I'm voting for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2013, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
nat-geo-sprawl-map-2001.jpg (image)

Its an old map but by eyeballing it, looks like either Dallas, Los Angeles or Boston.
nice map. That area from ATL to Raleigh looks like it might be a beast in the future
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Anyway, thanks for showing LA in its entirety and beyond and cutting out like 8 counties for Houston
No, I just outlined what appears to be the principal area('blob') of contigious development. Did I leave out millions of invisible Houstonians? No, I didnt. LOL

LA doesnt stop for 20 miles before the Inland Empire begins, the transition is seamless and is invisible from any map.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:04 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,485,386 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
LA doesnt stop for 20 miles before the Inland Empire begins, the transition is seamless and is invisible from any map.
Whoops forgot about the Inland Empire which the census tabulates as a separate urban area. Los Angeles + Inland Empire would be #4 in size, just under Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
If you want "spread out" go here:

List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

click on arrows under Land Area (twice to get descending). Los Angeles isn't in the top 3. It's New York, Sprawlanta, then Chicago. Los Angeles is #7. The urban areas of the Bay Area are listed separately, but you can add them up. San Francisco/Oakland + San Jose + Concord + Santa Rosa contains about 1012 square miles, #16 on the list between Seattle and Tampa but almost double the population of Seattle's urban area.

#4 on the list is Philly, so that's what I'm voting for.
That isnt a ranking of the most spread out, but the Urban Areas as defined by the Census Bureau.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Hahahaha....you guys should just fly to LA and then drive from Thousand Oaks to Redlands.

After that, you would never again question who is 2nd as far as uninterrupted development and consistent density(a factor I am inclined to say LA actually beats NY in btw)

Ive been everywhere and rent cars and drive extensively whenever I travel for work meetings and conferences and trust me, LA is probably 3rd in the world to only Tokyo and NY as far as 'feeling big'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
I know its sprawl and everything but these are comforting at night when I fly:


http://blogs.voanews.com/tedlandphai...er-fl-cr-c.jpg
http://www.travels.com/Cms/images/Gl...-main_Full.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0cHC1JwcVv...74nwo1_500.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__otDLFKD2L...icture+390.jpg
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/201...06_620x350.jpg
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Uni...61_2882454.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...XZfKniKAAgv8jw
http://images.colourbox.com/thumb_COLOURBOX4661005.jpg
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno.../sn-lights.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...M2l-xUtpzc073l


Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
No, I just outlined what appears to be the principal area('blob') of contigious development. Did I leave out millions of invisible Houstonians? No, I didnt. LOL

LA doesnt stop for 20 miles before the Inland Empire begins, the transition is seamless and is invisible from any map.
Its a travesty to leave out Galveston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 12:17 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,485,386 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Hahahaha....you guys should just fly to LA and then drive from Thousand Oaks to Redlands.

After that, you would never again question who is 2nd as far as uninterrupted development and consistent density(a factor I am inclined to say LA actually beats NY in btw)
I recommend Lindenhurst, NY to Asbury Park, NJ.

https://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=L...,7,8,9,10&z=13

during rush hour for added fun. 100 miles of continuous. The geography of NYC makes it hard to compare. As for continuous dense big city concrete jungle feel NYC wins by far. You can drive nearly an hour through the boros and feel continous dense city. Even if you don't go into Manhattan.

Quote:
Ive been everywhere and rent cars and drive extensively whenever I travel for work meetings and conferences and trust me, LA is probably 3rd in the world to only Tokyo and NY as far as 'feeling big'.
What about Mexico City? And Paris with its the higher densities might be a competitor.

Last edited by nei; 03-07-2013 at 01:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 01:07 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,500,362 times
Reputation: 9263
Throw in Homestead, FL - Jupiter, FL for a fun drive

https://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=H...t=h&mra=ls&z=8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post

What about Mexico City? And Paris with its the higher densities might be a competitor.
Yes, they are dense but very compact compared to the massive LA Area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nei
I recommend Lindenhurst, NY to Asbury Park, NJ.

https://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=L...,7,8,9,10&z=13

during rush hour for added fun. 100 miles of continuous. The geography of NYC makes it hard to compare. As for continuous dense big city concrete jungle feel NYC wins by far. You can drive nearly an hour through the boros and feel continous dense city. Even if you don't go into Manhattan.
Yes, and LA is 2nd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top