Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2017, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,926,582 times
Reputation: 8365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ki0eh View Post
For PA, I'd say a belt from southern Potter through western Clinton and Cameron counties. About the only reason to go into this area is to deer hunt, or visit one state park that got branded a "dark sky" area.
Yeah-was going to mention Cherry Springs State Park for PA-supposedly one of the best places to see stars in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2017, 11:01 AM
 
Location: The Springs
1,778 posts, read 2,883,574 times
Reputation: 1891
Having lived there, I'd say the San Luis Valley in Colorado. 8,000 square miles (bigger than CT & RI combined) with a total population of 48,000. That's a lot of room. There are major universities that have more students than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2017, 11:47 AM
 
Location: "The Dirty Irv" Irving, TX
4,001 posts, read 3,261,035 times
Reputation: 4832
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
Northwestern MA seems a bit remote, and it's the furthest away from Boston. Outside of an occasional music festival, there isn't all that much going on, and the closest urban area of any size is Albany, NY.

In Vermont, any area outside of Burlington, and maybe Montpelier-Barre, is in fact pretty remote...
VT is somewhat remote, you aren't really ever more than two hours from a decent sized city and that state overall is about the middle of the road on population density, slightly less than average, but considering there aren't any really big cities to throw it off, overall it is probably more dense than most.

Parts of Maine are pretty remote for the east coast.

MA isn't even a little bit remote. Parts are rural for sure, but the whole state is pretty densely populated. In fact #3 behind NJ and RI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2017, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Chicago
6,160 posts, read 5,705,622 times
Reputation: 6193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
Northern Missouri isn't as isolated as southern Missouri east of Springfield is. Let's take a look at Brookfield, a small town in the center of northern Missouri, and Winona, a small town in the center of southern Missouri east of Springfield.

Here are all the cities and towns with 10,000+ population located within 100 miles of Winona:


Jonesboro, AR (74,889)
Cape Girardeau, MO (39,628)
Paragould, AR (28,232)
Rolla, MO (20,075)
Farmington, MO (18,355)
Poplar Bluff, MO (17,233)
Sikeston, MO (16,327)
Jackson, MO (15,036)
Lebanon, MO (14,709)
Mountain Home, AR (12,363)
West Plains, MO (12,320)
Festus, MO (12,104)
Union, MO (11,277)
Batesville, AR (10,740)
Kennett, MO (10,564)


That's a decent number. So, with all these cities and towns within 100 miles of Winona, how can somebody say that it's isolated? Well, here are all the cities and towns with 10,000+ population located within 50 miles of Winona:


West Plains, MO (12,320)


End of list. There just isn't much near Winona that wouldn't require being away from home for most of the day. On the other hand, here are all the cities and towns with 10,000+ population located within 100 miles of Brookfield:


Kansas City, MO (481,420)
Overland Park, KS (188,966)
Kansas City, KS (151,709)
Columbia, MO (120,612)
Independence, MO (117,030)
Lee's Summit, MO (100,235)
St. Joseph, MO (76,472)
Blue Springs, MO (52,431)
Jefferson City, MO (43,013)
Quincy, IL (40,531)
Leawood, KS (34,565)
Liberty, MO (30,614)
Raytown, MO (29,261)
Gladstone, MO (27,114)
Grandview, MO (25,190)
Ottumwa, IA (24,487)
Prairie Village, KS (21,805)
Sedalia, MO (21,489)
Raymore, MO (20,839)
Warrensburg, MO (20,251)
Hannibal, MO (17,808)
Kirksville, MO (17,519)
Moberly, MO (13,863)
Grain Valley, MO (13,684)
Fulton, MO (13,103)
Marshall, MO (12,897)
Mexico, MO (11,680)
Excelsior Springs, MO (11,522)
Keokuk, IA (10,431)


That's a lot. Also narrowly missing the 10,000+ cutoff are Kearney, MO (9,790); Chillicothe, MO (9,714) and Smithville, MO (9,455), all of which are projected to have 10,000+ population by 2020. And here are all the cities and towns with 10,000+ population located within 50 miles of Brookfield:


Kirksville, MO (17,519)
Moberly, MO (13,863)
Marshall, MO (12,897)


Chillicothe is also within 50 miles. I think it's safe to say that southern Missouri east of Springfield is more remote than anywhere in northern Missouri.
I had a friend in school in Kirksville and it was very remote up there. There are a few larger towns not far away, but Kirksville is about 3hr from Kansas City and 3.5 from St Louis. You can't easily take a day trip to the city. And getting to the airport is a royal pain.

I will add that Northern Missouri has far more 10-20K resident towns than Southern MO, so it doesn't feel quite as remote, even though it's still far from a city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2017, 02:36 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,730,784 times
Reputation: 17393
Quote:
Originally Posted by lepoisson View Post
I had a friend in school in Kirksville and it was very remote up there. There are a few larger towns not far away, but Kirksville is about 3hr from Kansas City and 3.5 from St Louis. You can't easily take a day trip to the city. And getting to the airport is a royal pain.

I will add that Northern Missouri has far more 10-20K resident towns than Southern MO, so it doesn't feel quite as remote, even though it's still far from a city.
I'm not saying that northern Missouri isn't remote, just that southern Missouri east of Springfield is even more remote, partly because the larger towns are more evenly distributed across northern Missouri. Most of the larger towns in southern Missouri east of Springfield are within 50 miles of the Mississippi River, leaving a large area that's very thinly populated. When Willow Springs and Cabool are used as control cities on U.S. 60 and U.S. 63 in southern Missouri, then you know there's not much around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2017, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,551,112 times
Reputation: 19539
^
To get concrete statistical data, you could compare population density on a county by county basis, but that is often a bit misleading due to differences in county sizes as well as national or state forest lands that can be contained within them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2017, 06:00 PM
 
828 posts, read 647,325 times
Reputation: 973
For ND, it's hard to say as population is somewhat scattered, but probably NE of Williston, perhaps somewhere between Minot and Williston, In GA, there are several contenders with southern part of the Sea Islands, most of SW Georgia and far northeast Georgia. PA, it's easier to say, and it is the so-called "PA Wilds" on US-6 near Potter County and just south of there (Cameron county, Northumberland County, etc.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2017, 03:03 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,531,096 times
Reputation: 29284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_SW_77 View Post
Pretty much anywhere that isn't Albuquerque, Santa Fe or Las Cruces is remote. But the most remote part is probably Northeastern NM near the OK/TX/CO borders.
I'd bet the area around catron county on the western edge is more remote.
heck, the county seat of catron co. (reserve) is less than 300 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2017, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Midtown Omaha
1,224 posts, read 2,188,398 times
Reputation: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
I'd bet the area around catron county on the western edge is more remote.
heck, the county seat of catron co. (reserve) is less than 300 people.
The county seat of Blaine County in Nebraska is Brewster with all of 17 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2017, 07:30 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,730,784 times
Reputation: 17393
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDFan View Post
In GA, there are several contenders with southern part of the Sea Islands, most of SW Georgia and far northeast Georgia.
I disagree with most of this. There's nothing remote at all about coastal Georgia. It's served by I-95, which is the most important and heavily traveled north/south Interstate in the U.S., and the city of Brunswick has a metropolitan area of 124,902 people, per 2016 Census Bureau estimates. Glynn County, where Brunswick is seated, had a population of 92,620 in 2016, up from 79,626 in 2010, and projected to be 101,283 by 2020. Outside of the Atlanta metropolitan area, coastal Georgia is the fastest-growing part of the state. And not too far inland from the coast are the towns of Hinesville and Waycross, and Fort Stewart. Plenty of people live along or near the Georgia coast.

As for the north Georgia mountains, it is more remote than coastal Georgia, but it's also fast-growing, and with the northern edge of the Atlanta urbanized area now in Bartow, Cherokee, Forsyth and Hall Counties, it's possible to drive to the Atlanta urbanized area from anywhere in the north Georgia mountains, especially now with three different north/south highway corridors serving them. Also, depending on where you are, you're not far from smaller cities in Georgia like Rome, Dalton, Gainesville and Athens, or even cities in adjacent states like Chattanooga, TN and Anderson, SC.

With all that said, you are correct about southwest Georgia, especially the area south of Columbus and west of Albany. There's just not much happening there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NDFan View Post
PA, it's easier to say, and it is the so-called "PA Wilds" on US-6 near Potter County and just south of there (Cameron county, Northumberland County, etc.)
Northumberland County is located along I-80. The most remote counties in northern Pennsylvania are Elk, Cameron, Potter, and parts of McKean and Clinton Counties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top