Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-21-2010, 10:52 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,898,942 times
Reputation: 7643

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
I always thought it was. hmmm.

They do list Phoenix-Scottsdale, Seattle/Tacoma, Tampa/ St Petersburg, Minn/St P
I guess FW got shafted again and they referred to the metroplex as Dallas once again
No surprise there.....

I'd also say they included Arlington in that as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2010, 07:37 AM
 
413 posts, read 819,257 times
Reputation: 123
That list obviously doesn't differentiate between visiting for Tourism versus visiting for family/work reasons. There is no other way Miami would be that low on the list otherwise. Probably it would be the second most visited after NYC if you consider strictly for tourism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2010, 11:30 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Energy_Fin_Guy View Post
That list obviously doesn't differentiate between visiting for Tourism versus visiting for family/work reasons. There is no other way Miami would be that low on the list otherwise. Probably it would be the second most visited after NYC if you consider strictly for tourism.
riiiiiiiiiight your posts get curiouser and curiouser . oh my, what a wonderland some posters on here live in. Must be the hallucinogenics cominig into the country from South Florida.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2010, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,570,868 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Energy_Fin_Guy View Post
That list obviously doesn't differentiate between visiting for Tourism versus visiting for family/work reasons. There is no other way Miami would be that low on the list otherwise. Probably it would be the second most visited after NYC if you consider strictly for tourism.
No, it wouldn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2010, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
One of the links below lists this for Miami for 2007:


13. Miami, Fla. 19.7 million visitors (11.6 million overnight): 11.2 million rooms sold
you can't argue with number of rooms sold. Miami is not as mighty as you think it is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2010, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by skrizzle View Post
I don't understand, how come some of the higher place ones like say LV is # 1 but LA shows it has more visitors?
I think there is a weighted score. LA had more visitors, but LV had more rooms sold. It is still weird because LV sold more rooms than they had visitors. That is hard to explain, are people buying one room to sleep in, another to keep their winnings?

here is the breakdown for 2007. Houston sold more rooms than SD, but ranked lower. ie the opposite of the LV/LA senario

1. Las Vegas, Nev. 38.9 million visitors; 40 million rooms sold. Total weighted score: 4.48
2. Los Angeles, Calif. 58.6 million (25.4 million overnight + 33.2 estimated day visitors); 25.5 million rooms sold; score: 4.22
3. Orlando, Fla. 47.8 million visitors; 27.2 million rooms sold; score: 3.90
4. New York City, N.Y. 44 million visitors; 23.9 million rooms sold; score: 3.52
5. Chicago, Ill. 41.3 million (2005); 24.8 million rooms sold; score 3.47
6. Washington, D.C. metro area 36.9 million; 22.8 million rooms; score: 3.15
7. Atlanta, Ga. 37 million visitors; 21.5 million rooms sold; score: 3.05
8. San Diego, Calif. 32.2 million visitors (2005); 14.2 million rooms sold; score: 2.33
9. Houston, TX 31 million; 14.5 million rooms sold; score: 2.31
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2010, 02:48 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,805,239 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
I think there is a weighted score. LA had more visitors, but LV had more rooms sold. It is still weird because LV sold more rooms than they had visitors. That is hard to explain, are people buying one room to sleep in, another to keep their winnings?

here is the breakdown for 2007. Houston sold more rooms than SD, but ranked lower. ie the opposite of the LV/LA senario

1. Las Vegas, Nev. 38.9 million visitors; 40 million rooms sold. Total weighted score: 4.48
2. Los Angeles, Calif. 58.6 million (25.4 million overnight + 33.2 estimated day visitors); 25.5 million rooms sold; score: 4.22
3. Orlando, Fla. 47.8 million visitors; 27.2 million rooms sold; score: 3.90
4. New York City, N.Y. 44 million visitors; 23.9 million rooms sold; score: 3.52
5. Chicago, Ill. 41.3 million (2005); 24.8 million rooms sold; score 3.47
6. Washington, D.C. metro area 36.9 million; 22.8 million rooms; score: 3.15
7. Atlanta, Ga. 37 million visitors; 21.5 million rooms sold; score: 3.05
8. San Diego, Calif. 32.2 million visitors (2005); 14.2 million rooms sold; score: 2.33
9. Houston, TX 31 million; 14.5 million rooms sold; score: 2.31
Same with Atlanta and D.C. - Atlanta had a few more visitors, but D.C. had more rooms sold. I guess more people per hotel room in Atlanta?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 03:05 PM
 
Location: PC
28 posts, read 44,019 times
Reputation: 40
Cant say I agree with that list
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 06:33 PM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,553,213 times
Reputation: 6790
I think it's rare for a Forbes list to ever get much agreement here. I don't know if that their lists are that bad or that their results just don't appeal to C-D's demographic. I'm tempted to think the latter, but there are times I think their lists are a bit peculiar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,301,334 times
Reputation: 13293
Where's NO?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top