Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's always something either suspicious, wrong, or both about these Forbes lists. It's almost like they didn't have anything better to do than compile them--without putting much effort into such abstract concepts as, how shall I say, research. So I tend to discount whatever they're trying to "prove."
There's always something either suspicious, wrong, or both about these Forbes lists. It's almost like they didn't have anything better to do than compile them--without putting much effort into such abstract concepts as, how shall I say, research. So I tend to discount whatever they're trying to "prove."
I'm sure it isn't perfect, but it does account for over-estimations and other such errors. It's just like any other list...if your city is highly ranked, it's awesome. If your city didn't make the list, it's suspicious or wrong. Simple as that.
But my city did make the list. It came in fourth, even though it had more visitors than number one. I call that both suspicious and wrong.
AGAIN...it isn't based on the raw number of visitors. That is a big part of the equation, but if you will look at the methodology involved in the ranking you will get a better picture of how the cities are ranked.
More people vist Phoenix than San Fran, Miami or Boston?!!
uhhhh......why?
This must include business trips, as was my parents reason for a recent trip to Atlanta. I can't imagine people go to all these cities simply for the "tourist attractions".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.