Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2013, 03:50 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,549 posts, read 28,630,498 times
Reputation: 25117

Advertisements

Life was ALWAYS better in the past. Everybody knows this. ;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Who Cares, USA
2,341 posts, read 3,594,064 times
Reputation: 2258
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
Life was ALWAYS better in the past. Everybody knows this. ;-)
I don't think anyone is saying this. Things were undeniably less expensive back then. It's not just "looking back through rose-tinted lenses" nostalgia. A lot of things have improved since then as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Taipei
7,775 posts, read 10,152,240 times
Reputation: 4984
It's nearly impossible to compare costs of things between different eras. There are several different ways to attempt to convert value. This website explains the difficulties pretty well: Measuring Worth - Relative Value of the US Dollar.

They show $100K in 1970 being anywhere from $460K to $1.5 Million as of 2012.

Intuitively to me your comparison cant work cause there are so many more variables than just inflation. Like…how much of a person's income was typically spent on housing back then versus nowadays? How important was owning a home? What was the average relative cost for other important things (like vehicles)? What were interest rates and how easy was it to obtain loans? Even home-building techniques and costs of materials have likely changed drastically. It's possible that back then a very nice home on average cost just 50K…so spending 100K was being very extravagant. For example…how much money do you think the average family spent on communications technology per month? Nowhere near the equivalent of today's average family cell phone plan. One last issue: real estate prices are vastly different throughout this country. Today if you spend 500K on a home in FL you're probably being extravagant. In CA that's quite modest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 04:39 PM
 
375 posts, read 799,712 times
Reputation: 330
I wonder if part of it is too that we didn't have to pay for much back in the 70's. No Cable, no internet, no netflix, no cell phones. Those eat up a good chunk of change, and are necessities now. You just had to pay rent and utilities in the 70's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
3,410 posts, read 4,464,653 times
Reputation: 3286
Home values seemed to have been a heck of a lot lower even back in the 90s. My parents' home has more than tripled in value since they bought back in '93. I'm not sure how so many people in Jersey can afford to purchase $500k-$600k 3/4 bdr. ~2k sqft. homes considering the median household income in Jersey is around $70k and only a little over 4% of households make over $200k a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 07:08 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,549 posts, read 28,630,498 times
Reputation: 25117
Quote:
Originally Posted by projectmaximus View Post
Intuitively to me your comparison cant work cause there are so many more variables than just inflation. Like…how much of a person's income was typically spent on housing back then versus nowadays? How important was owning a home? What was the average relative cost for other important things (like vehicles)? What were interest rates and how easy was it to obtain loans? Even home-building techniques and costs of materials have likely changed drastically.
Another factor is that the United States has 110 million more people today than it did in 1970.

It would be interesting to see how that figures into supply/demand for housing - especially in the nation's largest cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 10:06 PM
 
6,904 posts, read 7,597,105 times
Reputation: 21735
I paid in-state university tuition in Washington state from 1976 - 1980. I remember tuition was about $200 a quarter - so tuition was about $600 a year (I worked in the summers.)

Sorry!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,433,203 times
Reputation: 35863
Back in the 70's I paid $125 a month for a beautiful one bedroom apartment in Chicago. Heat was included in the rent. I only had to pay gas for cooking which was about $3.00 a month and electricity was came to maybe $5.00. I earned around $8,000 a year. I lived very well. I took trips, had nice clothes and ate out occasionally. I had all the entertainment I wanted. As someone mentioned, there were not as many gadgets to spend money on as there are today. I was never in debt and had a savings account.

I remember the S&L's being closed by the government for over extending themselves in loans (sound familiar?). People talked about inflation then. If you watch reruns on the show "All In The Family" which was made in the '70's they discuss that subject a lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2013, 11:09 PM
 
6,904 posts, read 7,597,105 times
Reputation: 21735
I also remember interest rates on CDs hit 12% ca. 1980, due to inflation, which was VERY bad that year. It's now known as the "super inflation" period, worse than the past few years. I graduated from U in 1980 during that super inflation when jobs were VERY hard to find. But we didn't seem to whine as much as kids do now - I guess because the technology for mass whining hadn't been invented yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:59 AM
 
47 posts, read 65,283 times
Reputation: 76
It's still quite cheap compared to Australia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top