Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2014, 10:40 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,904,687 times
Reputation: 27266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rorytmeadows View Post
One ice storm every decade isn't a reason to not consider an area for weather. It's not a coincidence that the South is booming in terms of migration.

My favorite article to link: How The South Will Rise To Power Again - Forbes
My point about ice storms was to counter Jason_show's point about Dallas being almost immune from natural disasters. It gets occasional ice storms, tornadoes touch down in the region at times, and brutal heat waves aren't uncommon.

At any rate, my point, once again, is that it's hard to fathom many people moving to Dallas only or first and foremost due to scenery/weather. I'm sure a few people do, but for the majority, it's just one factor among others--with jobs, affordable housing, and amenities topping the list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2014, 10:49 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,956,641 times
Reputation: 6059
Why do people in this thread ignore the huge impact natural growth has on population growth?

Texas is a high fertility state with large migration from Mexico as well. This needs to be taken into consideration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Charleston, SC metro
3,517 posts, read 5,315,781 times
Reputation: 1403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
My point about ice storms was to counter Jason_show's point about Dallas being almost immune from natural disasters. It gets occasional ice storms, tornadoes touch down in the region at times, and brutal heat waves aren't uncommon.

At any rate, my point, once again, is that it's hard to fathom many people moving to Dallas only or first and foremost due to scenery/weather. I'm sure a few people do, but for the majority, it's just one factor among others--with jobs, affordable housing, and amenities topping the list.
I'd be interested in a poll of those who moved to Texas or Dallas, etc.. I just don't think jobs are that important for people, but that's my bias. I just cannot fathom moving to a crappy locale for a good job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 10:54 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,956,641 times
Reputation: 6059
North Texas has very high home owners insurance premiums and I assume an important reason for this is the extreme weather there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,293 posts, read 6,055,643 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Why do people in this thread ignore the huge impact natural growth has on population growth?

Texas is a high fertility state with large migration from Mexico as well. This needs to be taken into consideration.
Even so it has some of the highest rates of domestic migration as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,526,631 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravingMountains View Post
No. The Great Lakes could have the best economies on earth right now and I still wouldn't move there. Too damn cold.

People moved to the north in the old days because their was no A/C or medicines for tropical diseases. Now that these exist the chance of the freezing north ever making a comeback is slim to none.
Absolutely ridiculous!

I wouldn't move South no matter what - so that makes it objectively 50/50 then? Who cares what you would do? People move for economic reasons over all others, period. Weather is way down the list and accounts for only a tiny % of moves when it comes to people under 70 at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,293 posts, read 6,055,643 times
Reputation: 9623
This is going to open the door wide open for ridicule but I can't help myself. I saw this somewhere and it made me giggle.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:22 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,904,687 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by rorytmeadows View Post
I'd be interested in a poll of those who moved to Texas or Dallas, etc.. I just don't think jobs are that important for people, but that's my bias. I just cannot fathom moving to a crappy locale for a good job.
So you think the big cities got to be big because everybody just loved the weather and scenery?

Cities are commercial centers first and foremost; that is why they exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:24 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,904,687 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Absolutely ridiculous!

I wouldn't move South no matter what - so that makes it objectively 50/50 then? Who cares what you would do? People move for economic reasons over all others, period. Weather is way down the list and accounts for only a tiny % of moves when it comes to people under 70 at least.
I generally agree with this. Weather may be a significant consideration for some, but for very few people other than retirees will it be THE major reason IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,526,631 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
So you think the big cities got to be big because everybody just loved the weather and scenery?

Cities are commercial centers first and foremost; that is why they exist.
You bet

Often the "prettiest" areas are the least settled, not most. In Wisconsin, the areas with the least population are the most beautiful - the Driftless and the Northwoods. The most beautiful part of the country (the West) is also the least populated. Etc. It's generally water routes, rivers lakes & coastal regions, which can obviously be quite beautiful, but that has nothing to do with the strategic placement nor why they grew over the years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top