Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2015, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,053 posts, read 19,214,957 times
Reputation: 6911

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimusPrime69 View Post
lol, isn't philly already like 70 miles inland from the coast? I doubt rising sea levels is an extreme concern as opposed to cities like NYC and Miami....where they quite literally sit on the immediate coastline.
Look at an elevation map. Parts of South Philadelphia are only a few feet above sea level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2015, 01:48 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,698,254 times
Reputation: 7975
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...pear.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2015, 01:51 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,698,254 times
Reputation: 7975
Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimusPrime69 View Post
lol, isn't philly already like 70 miles inland from the coast? I doubt rising sea levels is an extreme concern as opposed to cities like NYC and Miami....where they quite literally sit on the immediate coastline.
miami moreo than NYC and Philly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2015, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Washington County, PA
4,240 posts, read 4,885,592 times
Reputation: 2859
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
miami moreo than NYC and Philly
By the map you posted they aren't even in the same league. If sea levels rose by 25', 100% of Miami would be flooded out. Philly would be 21% flooded out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 07:38 AM
 
545 posts, read 1,093,252 times
Reputation: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatsbyGatz View Post
How exactly will a city center "move"? All major cities are built out for the most part so "moving" a downtown into another neighborhood would essentially require the demolition of dozens of preexisting buildings which is never likely to happen because the cost to seize that land via eminent domain would be astronomical. It would also require a city to alter its entire infrastructure to compensate for higher development elsewhere. And city council doesn't build buildings--private developers do. Developers decide where they want to build and they are permitted or denied to build what they want by the city council. So unless demand is so high that developers are likely to turn over a profit (which would be unlikely due to land values dropping after something as devastating as a flood or sea levels rising), developers would just invest elsewhere.

And building a sea wall is not "insane". Manhattan is already underway with a new sea wall plan if memory serves me right.
why can't you accept the fact that cities change and adapt over time? it isn't unreasonable to think that a downtown could move over the span of 50-100 years. Brooklyn was at one time farm land, next to manhattan. then it was a quiet suburban area next to manhattan. now it has 2.5 million residents and is by itself one of the most booming, largest cities IN THE WORLD. over the course of a century cities could most deffinitely rearrange themselves, no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2015, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,615 posts, read 1,952,970 times
Reputation: 2189
I suspect the meter-high rise predicted this century will have little effect. Flooding will be more common. Some properties will retreat, but most cities will go about their business as usual. Many low-lying barrier islands will pay a heavy price though. NC's Outer Banks could feel the same fate as LA's Chandeleur islands, which is unfortunate.

Miami and New Orleans will probably feel it the most.

Later centuries though, those will be interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 03:35 PM
 
2,041 posts, read 1,498,609 times
Reputation: 1420
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Look at an elevation map. Parts of South Philadelphia are only a few feet above sea level.
Yes but Philly is on a river that can be dammed, so theoretically it doesn't have to take any flood prevention at all if it builds a dam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,061,814 times
Reputation: 4043
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoNgFooCj View Post
Yes but Philly is on a river that can be dammed, so theoretically it doesn't have to take any flood prevention at all if it builds a dam.
Think about it. Where is river water going to go if a dam prevents it from flowing to the sea? It backs up behind the dam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 04:05 PM
 
24,510 posts, read 17,988,287 times
Reputation: 40204
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Look at an elevation map. Parts of South Philadelphia are only a few feet above sea level.

People are really geographically challenged. The Delaware River at Philadelphia is tidal. There are navy ships there. The Connecticut River at Hartford CT is tidal. They run oil barges up it.


Where I'm from built a hurricane **** in New Bedford in the 1960s. At any storm surge and at king tides, they close the harbor entrance. Some cities have a topography where that kind of project is possible. Other's don't. Philly would probably be pretty straightforward. Boston and New York would cost a fortune.


You can do anything. All it takes is money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2019, 07:49 PM
 
13,945 posts, read 14,835,246 times
Reputation: 10383
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
People are really geographically challenged. The Delaware River at Philadelphia is tidal. There are navy ships there. The Connecticut River at Hartford CT is tidal. They run oil barges up it.


Where I'm from built a hurricane **** in New Bedford in the 1960s. At any storm surge and at king tides, they close the harbor entrance. Some cities have a topography where that kind of project is possible. Other's don't. Philly would probably be pretty straightforward. Boston and New York would cost a fortune.


You can do anything. All it takes is money.
Providence has a similar surge barrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top