Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Possible?
Yes 20 13.61%
No 127 86.39%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2017, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,924,564 times
Reputation: 10227

Advertisements

There should be a HELL NO option ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2017, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis, IN
631 posts, read 1,093,860 times
Reputation: 526
These cities are going to DOUBLE in 35 years, which took 200 years to get to this level? WOW!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Placitas, New Mexico
2,304 posts, read 2,962,618 times
Reputation: 2193
I think these figures are grossly large and overstated. Just pulled out of the air.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Middle America
11,097 posts, read 7,154,662 times
Reputation: 16999
At least 90% of us are paying attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
5,649 posts, read 5,965,050 times
Reputation: 8317
Quote:
Originally Posted by OuttaTheLouBurbs View Post









Phoenix: Water scarcity and consistent heat-related crises (see: planes can't take off from the runway cause it's too hot, 2017) chase people away from the city and the area. Phoenix begins to bleed out en masse and is down to only 1.0 Million by 2050.
What is this mumbo jumbo? Are you seriously saying one day of heat-related issues at the airport is something bad? Lets count the number of weather-related delays at Sky Harbor vs delays at JFK. Go ahead. Ill say PHX's weather is, by far and away, the most consistent in the US. Heat rarely affects airliners, but your ice and snow sure does. Lets get real here, man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,544,005 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
I think tearing down I-345 will be a huge mistake as it will force 45&75 traffic onto other roads making them worse. It should be left where it is
How about tunneling or trenching it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 05:01 PM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,117,737 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
How about tunneling or trenching it?
How about neither. Complete removal will greatly benefit the city of Dallas. So much development potential that will finally create a continuous urban form from Downtown through Deep Ellum. Dallas would be foolish to maintain it. A lot of people don't realize that MANY Dallas city streets are UNDER-utilized. While traffic will be pretty bad in the beginning, it will eventually resolve itself in the long run. The city needs to continually expand public transit though.

Most of the drivers are trying to bypass Downtown. DFW has so many highways that were designed to bypass Downtown, so why should the city continue to be a doormat for suburbanites? Especially ones that don't work, live, or even play in the city. Seriously, why let them walk all over us? Plano is proud to be a place where its residents can work, live, and play without having to leave it. Good for them. Now Dallas can focus on the CITY and not the 'burbs who really don't need Dallas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 11:24 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,982 posts, read 2,090,753 times
Reputation: 2185
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTXman34 View Post
How about neither. Complete removal will greatly benefit the city of Dallas. So much development potential that will finally create a continuous urban form from Downtown through Deep Ellum. Dallas would be foolish to maintain it. A lot of people don't realize that MANY Dallas city streets are UNDER-utilized. While traffic will be pretty bad in the beginning, it will eventually resolve itself in the long run. The city needs to continually expand public transit though.

Most of the drivers are trying to bypass Downtown. DFW has so many highways that were designed to bypass Downtown, so why should the city continue to be a doormat for suburbanites? Especially ones that don't work, live, or even play in the city. Seriously, why let them walk all over us? Plano is proud to be a place where its residents can work, live, and play without having to leave it. Good for them. Now Dallas can focus on the CITY and not the 'burbs who really don't need Dallas.
I see truckers and people just going through the region, but why would suburbanites be wanting to bypass Downtown? I mean, I cannot think of anything of interest south of Downtown and not within the city limits of Dallas, unless a person lives there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 10:12 AM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,117,737 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parhe View Post
I see truckers and people just going through the region, but why would suburbanites be wanting to bypass Downtown? I mean, I cannot think of anything of interest south of Downtown and not within the city limits of Dallas, unless a person lives there.
Bypassing to go to Houston. I only brought that up due to a few vocal CD posters from up north who oppose such a teardown because it would slow down their time passing through Dallas. Despite the fact we have so many loops and alternatives. But yes you are right, there's not much interest south of Downtown in general. As far as local traffic, we don't utilize our city streets that much. Most of the people are crowding on a highway because they know it's there. Here's a nice read on it from 2014, even before the CityMAP study:

https://www.dmagazine.com/publicatio...nterstate-345/

Stitching the Downtown & Deep Ellum grid together with a pedestrian friendly urban blvd. or pkwy would actually make things more efficient. I don't know if you've tried to drive from Uptown to Deep Ellum by using I-345 (or have had an Uber/Lyft driver use it), but it's not a pretty or efficient ride.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2018, 09:06 PM
 
2 posts, read 1,664 times
Reputation: 11
Default 10 Biggest Metro Areas in the US 2050

1. New York-Newark-Jersey City: 23,475,570
2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim: 16,039,570
3. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington: 11,806,940
4. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land: 11,600,776
5. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin: 9,807,065
6. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria: 8,941,198
7. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach: 8,909,648
8. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell: 8,639,874
9. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale: 7,317,220
10. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington: 6,666,389
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top