Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2016, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,449,641 times
Reputation: 35863

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumpDay View Post
The old Portland is where the new Portland is. It hasn't gone anywhere.
I would strongly disagree with you there. I relocated to Portland in the late 70's from Chicago. I relocated to Cleveland about a year and a half ago. Portland then does not even faintly resemble the Portland of today.

Even Cleveland resembles the Portland of yesteryear more than today's Portland although not quite that far back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-29-2016, 12:07 AM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,816,707 times
Reputation: 7167
I never understood threads like these. Cities are unique in many ways and you won't ever find another exact version of the same city elsewhere. You can find similar cities but there will always be something different about them that will make a huge difference.

In the case of Portland, it's in one of the cloudiest and rainiest parts of the country. I imagine that Portland is gloomy often. Lots of people suggest Austin as being similar to Portland but Austin is probably much sunnier, and this is a huge difference. Not to mention that Austin is in Texas which is way different than Oregon... Heck they even talk different over there.

The only way you could find an "old" Portland would be some other "weird, hipster" town in the Pacific Northwest. Even other places in the West, while we do share some similarities culturally, will have a big different cultural element. The West may be the closest outside of the "west of the Cascades" region but it's still different. And it will become even more different the further you get, whether its to the Midwest, the South, or the Northeast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2016, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Arvada, CO
13,827 posts, read 29,939,634 times
Reputation: 14429
It's probably Salem or Eugene, but nobody knows or wants to admit it yet.
__________________
Moderator for Los Angeles, The Inland Empire, and the Washington state forums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-29-2016, 10:38 AM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,313,277 times
Reputation: 1469
Wouldn't old Portland be pre-1970s Portland when it was sort of industrial/working class port/lumber town? The whole kind of artsy and weird Portland deal seems to be something that started in the 70s and 80s(from what I've heard and read) when the city was cheap and losing population before it picked up in the 90s and then peaked in the last decade with transplants moving from places that were suddenly way more expensive.

You can still find working class/middle class old Portland on the outskirts of the N and NE/SE Portland. Once you get east of 60th or 82nd or north of Killingsworth you still have a lot of the older residents and some more lowkey or grittier areas and kind of charming dive bars(even if those neighborhoods have been slowly gentrified). Though in the last couple years even those areas haven't been cheap. But it's still there even as things change. Like St Johns in North Portland still has that sort of feel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2016, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,449,641 times
Reputation: 35863
The slogan "Keep Portland Weird" was brought to Portland in 2003 by Terry Currier, owner of the store "Music Millennium. Currier used it to create a business campaign for his store. It took hold and became a Portland slogan.

I moved to Portland in 1978, it was a unique city that looked nothing at all as it is today. There were artists, musicians, playwrights and many creative people who couldn't afford LA or even Seattle so they made their own venues. I was a part of local theater in those days some of which still exist.

If you knew where to go and what to do, Portland was really a mecca of entertainment and fun. Very low key though. That's what attracted the first flow of creative people who moved there from all parts of the US. That and the fact it was so cheap. Where else could poor actors rent an old theater to run by themselves (The Columbia-now CineMagic Movie Theater or Artists Repertory which literally began in ground floor side of a building) or small storefronts for a UFO or Hat Museum? Old Town was jumpin' with jazz places.

That was "old Portland." Just a piece. Which is nothing like "new Portland." Time marches on. It was fun while it lasted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2016, 12:42 AM
 
1,537 posts, read 1,913,143 times
Reputation: 1430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minervah View Post
That was "old Portland." Just a piece. Which is nothing like "new Portland." Time marches on. It was fun while it lasted.
Should be interesting to see how things play out when Portland prices start to even out with Seattle.

Almost all my friends who live in Portland ***** about it all the time, but I guess it isn't bad enough to get them to move yet.

Wish there were more cities out there to pick from as I do enjoy the PacNW a great deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2016, 10:53 AM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,313,277 times
Reputation: 1469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Pitt Ash View Post
Should be interesting to see how things play out when Portland prices start to even out with Seattle.

Almost all my friends who live in Portland ***** about it all the time, but I guess it isn't bad enough to get them to move yet.

Wish there were more cities out there to pick from as I do enjoy the PacNW a great deal.
I don't know if they'll even out with Seattle any time soon though since Seattle prices are still climbing upwards also. It's like asking when Seattle will even out with the Bay Area--prices are still going up(or were) in the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2016, 11:03 AM
 
1,537 posts, read 1,913,143 times
Reputation: 1430
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanuckInPortland View Post
I don't know if they'll even out with Seattle any time soon though since Seattle prices are still climbing upwards also. It's like asking when Seattle will even out with the Bay Area--prices are still going up(or were) in the Bay Area.
Well, yeah, but there has to be a point where someone looks at Portland's diminishing charm and lower wages and comes to the decision Seattle's better due to higher pay. In the past Portland had the lifestyle differentiator, but with the new development and the lack of historical preservation I don't really see what that big difference will be in the future.

Light rail? Seattle's beefing theirs up.
Setting? Seattle has always had a leg up here (although not sure on accessibility).
Traffic? If they add the million to the Portland metro it'll be just as bad as Seattle.

So what will it be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2016, 11:27 AM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,313,277 times
Reputation: 1469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Pitt Ash View Post
Well, yeah, but there has to be a point where someone looks at Portland's diminishing charm and lower wages and comes to the decision Seattle's better due to higher pay. In the past Portland had the lifestyle differentiator, but with the new development and the lack of historical preservation I don't really see what that big difference will be in the future.

Light rail? Seattle's beefing theirs up.
Setting? Seattle has always had a leg up here (although not sure on accessibility).
Traffic? If they add the million to the Portland metro it'll be just as bad as Seattle.

So what will it be?
People already make that decision though--Seattle grows just as fast if not faster than Portland in terms of % increase and much more in terms of total people who move there and move to the metro as a whole. Both are growing at the same time and both are getting more expensive. Living in Portland it's interesting the perception that Portland and Oregon are the fastest growing places in the US, when in fact most of the Western US is growing at similar or faster rates(Washington still has way more people that move to it)--Portland just has surprisingly high prices(to some) because construction hasn't kept up with demand--and there's a limited supply of "Old Portland" style neighborhoods.

It's not like people ever stopped moving to Seattle because more made the choice to move to Portland. Seattle could be as expensive as the Bay Area someday, Portland will still most likely be cheaper. If Portland prices were the same as Seattle you'd see a slowing of growth in Portland, yest, though at that point prices in Portland would also level off. And then Portland might be considered a comparable bargain still to the Bay Area or Seattle. It's all kind of relative.

Last edited by CanuckInPortland; 03-03-2016 at 11:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2016, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Oakland
765 posts, read 899,030 times
Reputation: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanuckInPortland View Post
People already make that decision though--Seattle grows just as fast if not faster than Portland in terms of % increase and much more in terms of total people who move there and move to the metro as a whole. Both are growing at the same time and both are getting more expensive. Living in Portland it's interesting the perception that Portland and Oregon are the fastest growing places in the US, when in fact most of the Western US is growing at similar or faster rates(Washington still has way more people that move to it)--Portland just has surprisingly high prices(to some) because construction hasn't kept up with demand--and there's a limited supply of "Old Portland" style neighborhoods.

It's not like people ever stopped moving to Seattle because more made the choice to move to Portland. Seattle could be as expensive as the Bay Area someday, Portland will still most likely be cheaper. If Portland prices were the same as Seattle you'd see a slowing of growth in Portland, yest, though at that point prices in Portland would also level off. And then Portland might be considered a comparable bargain still to the Bay Area or Seattle. It's all kind of relative.
Bahh I hate to hear that. I hope it never gets as expensive as the bay area. The displacement is so sad. These are people's homes!! Hopefully tech will move to or start up in cheaper cities. Actually, hopefully we all move to sustainable, local economies and care more about the earth we continue to destroy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top