Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2008, 10:54 AM
 
34 posts, read 133,399 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

Too big, too fast:

Charlotte, although I too am hopeful that the transit progress is one (just one, though) step in the right direction
San Diego
DC Metro
Phoenix
Atlanta
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2008, 05:48 PM
 
Location: C.R. K-T
6,202 posts, read 11,449,309 times
Reputation: 3809
Why did everyone who mentioned Houston or Atlanta suddenly forget about DFW? It is much bigger than those two places but it rarely gets mentioned or bashed.

Austin is another city that grew too fast. It became a small city within 5-10 years of popularity. I think it's as overrated as the O.C.

I heard that Calgary is sprawling like crazy right now; it's the size of the 5 boroughs of New York City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Maryland
266 posts, read 911,420 times
Reputation: 218
Las Vegas gets my vote! Amazing how much that city has changed in just the last 15 or 20 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 07:25 PM
 
Location: O-Town
1,781 posts, read 6,962,609 times
Reputation: 503
I would vote Atlanta and Orlando.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
DC Metro
How so? I don't see that at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2008, 03:19 PM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,110,118 times
Reputation: 977
As a city proper San Antonio was one of the fastest growing in recent census bureau statistics. Forbes also just recetly mentioned it almost made the list as one of fastest growing metros. It grew by nearly 1,000,000 people since 1980.

1980 1,071,954
2007 over 2,000,000
2020 2.5-2.7 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 11:53 PM
 
29 posts, read 53,937 times
Reputation: 23
I would say Stafford County, VA. It started booming in the late 1980's-early 1990's and hasn't slowed down yet. Parts of it are still rural, but lots of its farmland and woods in the northern part are now faceless, homogenous subdivisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 11:59 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,736,528 times
Reputation: 17398
I think the Raleigh-Durham CSA is growing too fast as we speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 01:38 AM
 
1,733 posts, read 2,180,654 times
Reputation: 2238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
I think the Raleigh-Durham CSA is growing too fast as we speak.
I was born, raised here, and still resire here--and I think I agree with you! It has absolutely EXPLODED. Before the economy went sour, people were moving here with NO job, they just "heard" it was the place to be and moved east/south.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Carrboro and Concord, NC
963 posts, read 2,410,116 times
Reputation: 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Special_Guest View Post
I was born, raised here, and still resire here--and I think I agree with you! It has absolutely EXPLODED. Before the economy went sour, people were moving here with NO job, they just "heard" it was the place to be and moved east/south.
Wake County growth

1970-1980: 72,423 (301,429 total in 1980)
1980-1990: 124,882 (426,311 total in 1990)
1990-2000: 201,535 (627,846 total in 2000)
2000-2010: 272,154 (approximately 900,000 in 2010 - official numbers aren't yet in, but this estimate does include a slight slowdown with in-migration 2008-2010)

It took Wake County 199 years to hit 300,000. It will take only 45 or so to get from there to 1,000,000, which is just for the entire county, and not the entire metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top