Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2016, 12:48 PM
 
2,249 posts, read 2,822,888 times
Reputation: 1501

Advertisements

What are some major cities today that 100 years ago were nothing special or insignificant, but have show impressive growth not just in population, but in economy, culture and recognition?

For me it's Miami and Seattle. Both cities 100 years ago were a joke. Today they are unique and impressive in their own ways.

Last edited by JMT; 05-23-2016 at 07:58 PM.. Reason: North American cities only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2016, 01:13 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,933,711 times
Reputation: 27279
I won't say it wasn't "anything special" because it was clearly already in growth mode, but my number one answer is Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 01:16 PM
 
2,249 posts, read 2,822,888 times
Reputation: 1501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
I won't say it wasn't "anything special" because it was clearly already in growth mode, but my number one answer is Los Angeles.
that's right I forgot about LA!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,918,229 times
Reputation: 10227
Pretty much every city in the Sunbelt except New Orleans, which lost much of its significance and fell off the national radar for a time.

Last edited by Newsboy; 05-23-2016 at 01:59 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 01:51 PM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,312,759 times
Reputation: 1469
By the 1920 census, Los Angeles was the 10th largest city in the US, largest city on the West Coast and growing quickly, so I'm not if it was necessarily insignificant. Seattle was the 20th largest city in the US and the third largest city on the West Coast and also a fairly booming port city(a lot of Seattle's neighborhoods date from this period). People always seem to think though that Seattle, Portland, and Denver are younger cities than they actually are, though they were fairly large regional centers in the early 1900s and in the top 20-30 cities in population in the US 100 years ago(and have a lot of development dating from this era).

In comparison, Dallas and Houston were much smaller than what they'd become(42nd and 45th in the US) and populations of 158,000 and 138,276--and San Antonio was actually the biggest city in Texas. But that's nothing compared with Miami and Phoenix which had populations of about 29,000 in 1920--but then you have Las Vegas which was a barely populated desert outpost of 2,300 people next to a train station. Las Vegas is also the biggest US city founded in the 20th Century I believe.

It's also interesting that 100 years ago, New Orleans was the only Southern city in the Top 30 US cities in terms of population(well, Louisville was 29th, so that's also Southern I suppose). Atlanta and Memphis were in the Top 40 in population, but for the most part there were no cities in the South with over 200,000 people except for New Orleans and Louisville.

Last edited by CanuckInPortland; 05-23-2016 at 03:12 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,918,229 times
Reputation: 10227
This Wikipedia entry pretty much answers the OP's question in full detail and without speculation or homerism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larges...de?wprov=sfsi1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 03:52 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,822 posts, read 5,627,677 times
Reputation: 7123
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanuckInPortland View Post
By the 1920 census, Los Angeles was the 10th largest city in the US, largest city on the West Coast and growing quickly, so I'm not if it was necessarily insignificant. Seattle was the 20th largest city in the US and the third largest city on the West Coast and also a fairly booming port city(a lot of Seattle's neighborhoods date from this period). People always seem to think though that Seattle, Portland, and Denver are younger cities than they actually are, though they were fairly large regional centers in the early 1900s and in the top 20-30 cities in population in the US 100 years ago(and have a lot of development dating from this era).

In comparison, Dallas and Houston were much smaller than what they'd become(42nd and 45th in the US) and populations of 158,000 and 138,276--and San Antonio was actually the biggest city in Texas. But that's nothing compared with Miami and Phoenix which had populations of about 29,000 in 1920--but then you have Las Vegas which was a barely populated desert outpost of 2,300 people next to a train station. Las Vegas is also the biggest US city founded in the 20th Century I believe.

It's also interesting that 100 years ago, New Orleans was the only Southern city in the Top 30 US cities in terms of population(well, Louisville was 29th, so that's also Southern I suppose). Atlanta and Memphis were in the Top 40 in population, but for the most part there were no cities in the South with over 200,000 people except for New Orleans and Louisville.
In 1920, Birmingham (36) and Richmond (38) we're also in the Top 40. And though they may have started transitioning already, 100 years ago Baltimore (8) and Washington (14) were very much still largely considered Southern cities....

https://www.census.gov/population/ww...0027/tab15.txt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 05:11 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,335,229 times
Reputation: 10644
LA, definitely. 100 years ago it wasn't that major of a U.S. city. Now it's the fourth largest economy on the planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 05:27 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,644,089 times
Reputation: 13630
Las Vegas because it had around 1,000-2,000 people then and was only incorporated 5 years earlier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,399,177 times
Reputation: 4077
Greenville SC
Huntsville AL (most due to the NASA, Redston arsenal coming to town)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top