Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2018, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,075,384 times
Reputation: 9795

Advertisements

No mountains, just hills (ht shown above sea level)

Buffalo:
- Lowest - along Niagara River near Strawberry Island - 560 ft
- Highest - University Heights - 699 ft
- elevation change and distance from highest to lowest point: 139 ft / 4 miles

Erie County:
- Lowest - Grand Island along Niagara River - 560 ft
- Highest - Town of Sardinia - 1940 ft
- elevation change and distance from highest to lowest point: 1380 ft / 36 miles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2018, 11:45 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,894,149 times
Reputation: 3263
Quote:
Originally Posted by TacoSoup View Post
In the city of San Diego Cowles Mountain is the tallest at 1,593 ft, In the county its Hot Spring Mountain at 6,535 ft. Its out in the desert, but Mt. Cuyamaca in the local mountains, and the one you see covered in snow as a backdrop to our skyline in pictures is 6,515 ft.


We also have a place in Running Springs, San Bernardino County. In town I'm guessing Slide Peak at Snow Valley Ski resort at 7,841 ft, with Mt. San Gorgonio at 11,489 ft being the tallest in the county.


The one I see the most from my place is yours, Mt. Baldy in LA county.


I will say seeing a 10K ft mountain from sea level is just as impressive as a 14K ft peak when already at 4-5K+ ft, like you will in the Rockies. Salt Lake City is pretty impressive though. Seeing Mt. Whitney (tallest in the continental US) at 14,495 ft, from Death Valley (lowest spot in US) at 280 ft below sea level is something else.


Seattle wins it for me with its views of Mt. Rainer at 14,410 ft from sea level. I have family with views of it from their house and it never gets old.


Mauna Kea at 13,802 ft on the Big Island of Hawaii in the winter is in a class of its own with the view from the beach, if not obstructed by the clouds
I hiked up Hot Springs mountain recently, an awesome view!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2018, 11:47 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,894,149 times
Reputation: 3263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
Not far from Salt Lake City, Utah is King's Peak at 13,527 feet.
Now I have to make plans to head to Salt Lake, wasn't aware of the peaks in such close proximity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2018, 12:28 AM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,873,269 times
Reputation: 8812
Salt Lake Valley (not the city, but the general valley) has perhaps the most dramatic valley to peak geography in the lower 48. Certainly for amajor urban area. As far as I know, there are no other major urban areas that offer this kind of scenery.

Other cities have mountain views, but they are from a distance. Seattle, Portland, Denver, even Los Angeles on a clear day. The Salt Lake Valley stands out in this regard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2018, 02:00 AM
 
160 posts, read 104,085 times
Reputation: 213
Although not a mountain at all, the highest elevation in Denver (City and County) is 5,688 ft. in the far west of the city. This high point in the city is almost completely flat and unassuming. These same elevations in North Carolina or Tennessee would reveal stunning mountain scenery with a several thousand ft. rise from the surrounding landscape. Kinda crazy if you think about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2018, 04:25 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati (Norwood)
3,530 posts, read 5,022,024 times
Reputation: 1930
In Cincinnati, there's no question as to the region's tallest mountain - it's Mt. Rumpke.

Although Mt. Rumpke is the highest point in SW Ohio (visible miles away and often sighted in on by pilots on landing approaches to CVG), for one reason alone, it's easily Cincinnati's least visited scenic attraction:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumpke_Sanitary_Landfill

No need to explain why only the brave or foolhardy ever risk all to summit it:
* https://www.meetup.com/hike-cincinnati/events/111953762/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2018, 06:37 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,461 posts, read 44,074,708 times
Reputation: 16840
In suburban DeKalb County, GA it would be the rather anomalous Stone Mountain at 1686'.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2018, 10:25 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,477 posts, read 11,555,088 times
Reputation: 11981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bellside High View Post
Although not a mountain at all, the highest elevation in Denver (City and County) is 5,688 ft. in the far west of the city. This high point in the city is almost completely flat and unassuming. These same elevations in North Carolina or Tennessee would reveal stunning mountain scenery with a several thousand ft. rise from the surrounding landscape. Kinda crazy if you think about it.
Denver does still own Winter Park so can we count the peak elevation there of 12,600 feet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2018, 12:42 AM
 
160 posts, read 104,085 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog77 View Post
Denver does still own Winter Park so can we count the peak elevation there of 12,600 feet?
I would say no as it is not in the defined 154.97 sq. mi. that is the City and County of Denver. Winter Park is located in Grand County nearly 70 miles from Denver. Sounds good tho, if we could actually claim this.

Last edited by Bellside High; 09-17-2018 at 12:46 AM.. Reason: Added content
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2018, 12:48 AM
 
160 posts, read 104,085 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog77 View Post
Denver does still own Winter Park so can we count the peak elevation there of 12,600 feet?
I would say no as it is not in the defined 154.97 sq. mi. that is the City and County of Denver. Winter Park is located in Grand County nearly 70 miles from Denver. Sounds good tho, if we could actually claim this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top