Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2018, 02:37 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,550 posts, read 81,117,303 times
Reputation: 57750

Advertisements

Walnut Creek, CA, though half the population reminds me of Bellevue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2018, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,437,452 times
Reputation: 35863
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTimidBlueBars View Post
Arlington, VA
Evanston, IL
I agree with Evanston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 03:45 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Frisco TX? It's not urban at all. Some people are really not getting what Bellevue is.

Evanston and Clayton are more like it, though they're in areas that were developed much earlier vs. DT Bellevue which was mostly horticulture until mid-century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,921,829 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason345 View Post
There is nothing urban about Bellvue, it is a smaller Mississauga.
I would actually make the argument that Bellevue is more urban than Mississauga. Mississauga is just a bunch of randomly placed residential high-rises around a mall, essentially a modern commie block. Bellevue on the other hand has it's high-rises come right up to the street and there are also many shops that line the streets as well as office buildings.


Missisauga
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5897...7i16384!8i8192
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5854...7i16384!8i8192
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5872...7i13312!8i6656

Bellevue
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6137...7i16384!8i8192
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6174...7i16384!8i8192
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6136...7i16384!8i8192


Now that being said Bellevue isn't super urban, and still has a suburban feel to it, but it's probably one of the most urban downtowns in North America that has been incorporated after WWII (1953)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 07:07 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Entirely wrong Jason. Mississaugua towers are mostly set back from the street, and often have big interior courtyards. Even the newer ones that go to the street -- finally some real urban formats -- often have two-story townhouses as part of the same development. In past decades many towers were built surface parking.

Bellevue isn't great urbanity, but it's not that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,237,207 times
Reputation: 6767
Walk along dt Bellevue's main st, Bellevue Way and tell me how urban it is. It's not urban at all. The blocks are way too long. The streets are way to wide, and not many walkers. It's a typical suburban city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,921,829 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason345 View Post
Not wrong at all, have you been to Mississauga? All the new towers front directly on the street, they also all have underground parking. Looks exactly like Bellevue only on a larger scale.

Do you live in Bellevue? That would explain some things. Bellevue isn't urbanity at all, be real.
Mississauga


Bellevue


I don't know about you, but to me it looks like Bellevue has a denser built city layout, sure Bellevue can't hold a candle to the likes of NYC, SF or even Seattle, but I think that it's more urban than Mississauga.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2018, 07:43 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Bellevue started building in an urban format in the mid-80s. Mississaugua started much more recently...after most current towers were already there.

Show us anything in Bellevue that's even remotely like this (the main mall): https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5931.../data=!3m1!1e3

Or these towers-in-a-park: https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5928.../data=!3m1!1e3

Or these office towers-in-parking-lots: https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5970.../data=!3m1!1e3

Or these: https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5896.../data=!3m1!1e3

Edit: Great comparison Grega. For the win. Even the mall is on 1/4 the land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top