Favorite Major Cities For Access to Nature (beach, rated)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seattle- obvious reasons
Boston- city has beaches and parks. Within 90 minutes you have the Whites, Coastal Maine, Newport, Cape Cod, skiing, hiking, cliffs etc
SF- mountains beaches ans everything
DC is actually a pretty good city for nature. Plenty of wildlife around the area (I saw a fox from my window the other night). Plenty of wetlands and water and large parks plus only 90 minutes from the mountains and 1 hour from the Chesapeake Bay.
You can access nature faster in smaller cities and there are a bunch to choose from. Albuquerque and Santa Fe, Salt Lake City, Colorado Springs, Tucson come to mind in the west. Maybe Sacramento and Portland (Oregon or Maine). Any number of smaller coastal cities would work for access to beach or coastal environments -- maybe Corpus Christi or Mobile or Charleston.
Location: Miami (prev. NY, Atlanta, SF, OC and San Diego)
7,411 posts, read 6,556,774 times
Reputation: 6686
San Francisco/Marin…Marin is in nature; would have deer come up to me during my morning runs. Amazing, just a few miles outside a major city along with mountains/forest-woods/bay, ocean, etc.
Last edited by elchevere; 07-01-2021 at 10:39 AM..
Pretty much all the major Western cities I’ve visited. I think Atlanta’s a pretty underrated one
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.