U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2021, 08:44 AM
 
4,868 posts, read 3,595,804 times
Reputation: 4356

Advertisements

Seattle is void of a good candidate, which is one of my major gripes with Seattle. Bellevue is nice, but trendy/cool? Not so much. Rest of the suburbs are prettttyyyy between the curve.

Austin is like Seattle in this way. Keep Austin weird only applies to Austin itself.

ATL's East Side is within city limits, and i'm not familiar with any sister cities that would apply.

New York has Jersey City, but with annexation and the collective Burroughs, not a lot of others to name. Surprising for a metro of that size, but it's always been all about NYC. Maybe NJ has more that I don't know about? But nothing with a brand.

For Chicago, Evanston and Oak Park are nice, and deliver everything from elegance to edginess within city limits. But neither are hip/cool - Not a strong bar scene, lot of chain restaurants, no real notable venues, not artist driven communities, etc. Neither are overly vibrant or in demand enough within the young demographic to stay overly current and intriguing to the alternative crowd. They're more "classic" Northern inner ring.

Though small, I think Conshohoken in Philly is one I'd point out.. Has that "gentrified feel" (hate saying that), good/local food scene, some eclectic bars, etc.

How about Coconut Grove near Miami? Haven't spent enough time.

The shining stars, to me, are the Bay Area, LA, and Boston. Probably not a lot of explaining needed. The Bay has Berkeley and the evolving areas in Oakland that are great candidates for this conversation. LA has, well, a dozen spots to note. Boston- though i'd argue they feel like more of a city extension - has Cambridge and Somerville.

Last edited by mwj119; 03-11-2021 at 08:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2021, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,995 posts, read 3,271,123 times
Reputation: 4929
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Seattle is void of a good candidate, which is one of my major gripes with Seattle. Bellevue is nice, but trendy/cool? Not so much. Rest of the suburbs are prettttyyyy between the curve.
I think Bellevue is not bad and it's a pretty quick drive from downtown Seattle. Lots of Asian restaurants, some decent nightclubs prior to Covid. It's growing rapidly too. In fact, since the pandemic, I've found myself going to Bellevue more for errands and food than downtown Seattle and I live in Seattle proper. I think in the next 10-15 years, Bellevue will be a lot more hopping than it is now. Amazon is already expanding rapidly there. It's not "Portland weird," but it's super clean, safe and shiny; there are no tent cities nor graffiti.


Bellevue skyline, not bad for a suburb of Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 10:19 AM
 
Location: OC
12,529 posts, read 8,776,333 times
Reputation: 10260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guineas View Post
I think Bellevue is not bad and it's a pretty quick drive from downtown Seattle. Lots of Asian restaurants, some decent nightclubs prior to Covid. It's growing rapidly too. In fact, since the pandemic, I've found myself going to Bellevue more for errands and food than downtown Seattle and I live in Seattle proper. I think in the next 10-15 years, Bellevue will be a lot more hopping than it is now. Amazon is already expanding rapidly there. It's not "Portland weird," but it's super clean, safe and shiny; there are no tent cities nor graffiti.


Bellevue skyline, not bad for a suburb of Seattle.
Lived in Bellevue and would live there again. It's cool, but I don't think of it as hip or trendy. It's pretty white collar and stuffy imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Oakland
763 posts, read 863,224 times
Reputation: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Seattle is void of a good candidate, which is one of my major gripes with Seattle. Bellevue is nice, but trendy/cool? Not so much. Rest of the suburbs are prettttyyyy between the curve.

Austin is like Seattle in this way. Keep Austin weird only applies to Austin itself.

ATL's East Side is within city limits, and i'm not familiar with any sister cities that would apply.

New York has Jersey City, but with annexation and the collective Burroughs, not a lot of others to name. Surprising for a metro of that size, but it's always been all about NYC. Maybe NJ has more that I don't know about? But nothing with a brand.

For Chicago, Evanston and Oak Park are nice, and deliver everything from elegance to edginess within city limits. But neither are hip/cool - Not a strong bar scene, lot of chain restaurants, no real notable venues, not artist driven communities, etc. Neither are overly vibrant or in demand enough within the young demographic to stay overly current and intriguing to the alternative crowd. They're more "classic" Northern inner ring.

Though small, I think Conshohoken in Philly is one I'd point out.. Has that "gentrified feel" (hate saying that), good/local food scene, some eclectic bars, etc.

How about Coconut Grove near Miami? Haven't spent enough time.

The shining stars, to me, are the Bay Area, LA, and Boston. Probably not a lot of explaining needed. The Bay has Berkeley and the evolving areas in Oakland that are great candidates for this conversation. LA has, well, a dozen spots to note. Boston- though i'd argue they feel like more of a city extension - has Cambridge and Somerville.
Really? Tacoma is super cool I think. It has a gritty artsy feel, lots of good/ affordable restaurants, different neighborhoods with their own personality, beautiful views, museums, historic architecture....

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2570...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2563...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2438...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2652...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2603...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2651...=en&authuser=0

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2230...=en&authuser=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,995 posts, read 3,271,123 times
Reputation: 4929
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaserbrad View Post
Agree. Point Defiance in Tacoma is awesome too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 03:41 PM
 
615 posts, read 521,561 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Seattle is void of a good candidate, which is one of my major gripes with Seattle. Bellevue is nice, but trendy/cool? Not so much. Rest of the suburbs are prettttyyyy between the curve.

Austin is like Seattle in this way. Keep Austin weird only applies to Austin itself.

ATL's East Side is within city limits, and i'm not familiar with any sister cities that would apply.

New York has Jersey City, but with annexation and the collective Burroughs, not a lot of others to name. Surprising for a metro of that size, but it's always been all about NYC. Maybe NJ has more that I don't know about? But nothing with a brand.

For Chicago, Evanston and Oak Park are nice, and deliver everything from elegance to edginess within city limits. But neither are hip/cool - Not a strong bar scene, lot of chain restaurants, no real notable venues, not artist driven communities, etc. Neither are overly vibrant or in demand enough within the young demographic to stay overly current and intriguing to the alternative crowd. They're more "classic" Northern inner ring.

Though small, I think Conshohoken in Philly is one I'd point out.. Has that "gentrified feel" (hate saying that), good/local food scene, some eclectic bars, etc.

How about Coconut Grove near Miami? Haven't spent enough time.

The shining stars, to me, are the Bay Area, LA, and Boston. Probably not a lot of explaining needed. The Bay has Berkeley and the evolving areas in Oakland that are great candidates for this conversation. LA has, well, a dozen spots to note. Boston- though i'd argue they feel like more of a city extension - has Cambridge and Somerville.
Decatur, GA is it’s own municipality. It is not apart of Atlanta and would most certainly qualify for this thread. Marietta, GA would qualify as well on the NW side of the metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Southwest Suburbs
4,591 posts, read 8,996,433 times
Reputation: 3276
I will go off the limb and say, for Chicago, it's Rosemont more so than Evanston or Oak Park. It can be accurately described as the entertainment hub of the region or county outside of Chicago itself. It's missing a sizable population(only 4,000 permanent residents), but it's packed with hotels, restaurants, convention centers, and bars that opened til the sunrise hours( pre-Covid), all within a less than 2 sq. mile area. Depending on how you define hip/trendy/cool, it has that going for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 08:14 PM
 
6,603 posts, read 16,236,403 times
Reputation: 4705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texamichiforniasota View Post
Minneapolis has St. Paul. Most of it isn't trendy, but it has a few cool neighborhoods.
St. Paul is not a neighborhood and it is not a suburb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2021, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,665 posts, read 5,545,281 times
Reputation: 5055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Around View Post
St. Paul is not a neighborhood and it is not a suburb.
Thread title does include "bordering cities".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 01:42 PM
 
2,526 posts, read 3,499,799 times
Reputation: 3356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicagoland60426 View Post
I will go off the limb and say, for Chicago, it's Rosemont more so than Evanston or Oak Park. It can be accurately described as the entertainment hub of the region or county outside of Chicago itself. It's missing a sizable population(only 4,000 permanent residents), but it's packed with hotels, restaurants, convention centers, and bars that opened til the sunrise hours( pre-Covid), all within a less than 2 sq. mile area. Depending on how you define hip/trendy/cool, it has that going for it.

River North West
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top