Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Eastern Colorado was the first place that came to mind when thinking of flat high areas. People forget just how flat Eastern Colorado is. Hilly and low lying would probably by SF.
Eastern Colorado was the first place that came to mind when thinking of flat high areas. People forget just how flat Eastern Colorado is. Hilly and low lying would probably by SF.
It’s not really flat except by comparison with the rest of CO. Same for the four CO areas mentioned in another post. They look flat, though.
Parts of TX panhandle and the area between Midland and Odessa (Permian Basin) are flat, and driving through them before continuing through eastern CO makes the distinction obvious.
Some of ID along I80 seems flat, but I don’t know if this is another case of perception by comparison. Also, the elevation is not high.
It’s not really flat except by comparison with the rest of CO. Same for the four CO areas mentioned in another post. They look flat, though.
Parts of TX panhandle and the area between Midland and Odessa (Permian Basin) are flat, and driving through them before continuing through eastern CO makes the distinction obvious.
Some of ID along I80 seems flat, but I don’t know if this is another case of perception by comparison. Also, the elevation is not high.
Atlanta is pretty flat (except for some local hills - Stone Mountain, Kennesaw Mountain), but the elevation of the city itself is 1,050 feet.
Atlanta is not in anyway flat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.