Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, just on the face of it, those cities are all nearby alternatives to larger but more expensive cities (NYC, SF, LA, and LA respectively). Although I'd expect Philadelphia instead of Boston if that's people's reasoning here.
Well, just on the face of it, those cities are all nearby alternatives to larger but more expensive cities (NYC, SF, LA, and LA respectively). Although I'd expect Philadelphia instead of Boston if that's people's reasoning here.
Likewise I'm surprised by Boston. It's nicer than Philadelphia, but financially it's still expensive with unexpectedly low wages given the costs.
I definitely think that a lot of cities, the "superstar cities" are getting super expensive and it's at a point where unless you make tons of money you literally can't afford to stay, especially people looking to have kids. Not surprising.
I definitely think that a lot of cities, the "superstar cities" are getting super expensive and it's at a point where unless you make tons of money you literally can't afford to stay, especially people looking to have kids. Not surprising.
And completely welcome. We have a lot of cities to develop in the US, why should everyone try to cram into five or six?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.