Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What metro do you think will undergo the most demographic change over the next 20 years?
Seattle 6 6.19%
San Francisco 5 5.15%
Los Angeles 1 1.03%
San Diego 0 0%
Denver 0 0%
Dallas 8 8.25%
Houston 2 2.06%
Atlanta 27 27.84%
Miami 3 3.09%
Philadelphia 5 5.15%
NYC 9 9.28%
Boston 5 5.15%
Chicago 1 1.03%
Detroit 9 9.28%
Minneapolis 1 1.03%
Phoenix 3 3.09%
Tampa 0 0%
Austin 4 4.12%
Charlotte 5 5.15%
Orlando 3 3.09%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2023, 04:32 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 5,985,671 times
Reputation: 3038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by waronxmas View Post
snip
I get it—I’m an Atlanta homer myself, love the city’s diversity, etc. But I think what’s happening in Orlando is exceptional. In the last 20 years, it has gone from Hispanic making up 16.5% of the population to 32% now. My 2040, it will probably be around 50% Hispanic.

Non-Hispanic Black will probably become the largest demographic group in metro Atlanta between 2030 and 2040, after making up 29% of metro Atlanta’s population in 2000.

Hispanic will probably become Orlando’s largest demographic group right at 2030, after making up just 16.5% of the population in 2000.

That’s a huge change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2023, 04:41 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 5,985,671 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
What kind of Asian growth is important. Its not Koreans that are causing the Asian growth in Atlanta, its Indians. In fact, Asian growth in Atlanta is extremely India heavy.

Atlanta's total Asian growth breaks down as follows. Between 2011-2021. This is Asian alone, not including Asian in combination:

Total Growth: 123,997
Indian Growth: 66,677
Chinese: 12,792
Vietnamese: 11,734
Korean: 4,489
Kinda doubt those numbers. I believe even new permanent status Koreans in metro Atlanta was greater than 4,400 in the last decade, let alone gross population growth (which includes domestic migration of Korean-Americans. It’s generally 600-800 per year just in that category.

Atlanta’s Asian community is very Korean heavy relative to most of the country. Even though they are outnumbered by Chinese, the Korean community is really visible and strong, with lots of Korean companies’ North American headquarters here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2023, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,333 posts, read 5,488,934 times
Reputation: 12286
Quote:
Originally Posted by testa50 View Post
Kinda doubt those numbers. I believe even new permanent status Koreans in metro Atlanta was greater than 4,400 in the last decade, let alone gross population growth (which includes domestic migration of Korean-Americans. It’s generally 600-800 per year just in that category.

Atlanta’s Asian community is very Korean heavy relative to most of the country. Even though they are outnumbered by Chinese, the Korean community is really visible and strong, with lots of Korean companies’ North American headquarters here.
You can’t look at two sets of numbers from the exact same source, choose to believe one and deny the other.

PS, Korean numbers across the US have dropped, not risen. Atlanta is one of the few Korean populations that rose at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2023, 05:26 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 5,985,671 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
You can’t look at two sets of numbers from the exact same source, choose to believe one and deny the other.

PS, Korean numbers across the US have dropped, not risen. Atlanta is one of the few Korean populations that rose at all.
Where did you find those numbers in the source waronxmas linked?

All I see that breaks down diversity within Asians is just 2000-2010 data in that particular source, which says that the Korean population in Atlanta MSA grew from 24,000 to 48,000 between 2000 and 2010:

https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/div...?metroid=12060

Perhaps growth dropped from 24,000 one decade to 4,000 in the next, but pardon me for having raised eyebrows about that claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2023, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,333 posts, read 5,488,934 times
Reputation: 12286
Quote:
Originally Posted by testa50 View Post
Where did you find those numbers in the source waronxmas linked?

All I see that breaks down diversity within Asians is just 2000-2010 data in that particular source, which says that the Korean population in Atlanta MSA grew from 24,000 to 48,000 between 2000 and 2010:

https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/div...?metroid=12060

Perhaps growth dropped from 24,000 one decade to 4,000 in the next, but pardon me for having raised eyebrows about that claim.
The numbers are all from the same place. Brown University pulls the numbers from a combination of the census figures and the ACS. Both are referenced in data.census.gov.

Korean immigration has come to a grinding halt to the US. Largely its because the gap between the standard of living in Korea vs. the US is now non-existent. It is also important to remember that the Permanent Residence numbers from the DHS handbook reflect past trends, not future trends. Most Koreans who are listed there would have been here for years. I get that isn't the case with countries like Venezuela or Cuba where the numbers operate more in real time, but Korea is a safe and stable country on the visa waiver program.

To the numbers I'm referencing, the foreign born Korean population is down on a national level. Between 2010-2020, it dropped by -49,487. The Korean American population growth doesn't even cover natural increase. It grew 22,748. To illistratate my point, below are the foreign born Korean growth numbers by metro area 2011-2021. Source is data.census.gov table number B05006.

Dallas/Fort Worth: 2,273
Atlanta: 997
Washington DC: 436
Seattle: -1,204
San Francisco: -4,918
Chicago: -6,097
New York City: -15,963
Los Angeles: -17,955

So Korean population growth isn't going to drive any city's Asian community. Not even Atlanta or DC.

I get that things can feel different. Hangul is a pretty distinctive writing system and I can see how Atlanta will certain feel more Korean than Indian (whose businesses use English more times that not). But Atlanta's Asian Growth is over 1/2 Indian. DFW's is more than 2/3 Indian. Even here in Houston, it feels WAYYYY more Chinese than Indian. But its not. There are a lot more Indians than Chinese in Houston. It just feels more Chinese because of all the signs in Chinese writing and the businesses stand out more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2023, 06:42 PM
 
Location: D.C. / I-95
2,750 posts, read 2,419,379 times
Reputation: 3363
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
What kind of Asian growth is important. Its not Koreans that are causing the Asian growth in Atlanta, its Indians. In fact, Asian growth in Atlanta is extremely India heavy.

Atlanta's total Asian growth breaks down as follows. Between 2011-2021. This is Asian alone, not including Asian in combination:

Total Growth: 123,997
Indian Growth: 66,677
Chinese: 12,792
Vietnamese: 11,734
Korean: 4,489
Are there any MSAs where Indian growth isn't #1 or #2 in Asian growth? The Indian American population seem to be growing in every part of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2023, 07:33 PM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,806,621 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio July View Post
How can you say Austin, when they've priced most of their minorities out and made it a model playground for high income/wealthy white people?

I mean, it's not like the cost of living is ever going to go back down in Austin, so you can expect more high income/wealthy white people to keep moving there and keep living there, and less and less minorities to be able to afford it.
You are reading too much into my post. All I said was that Austin will be interesting to see in 20 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2023, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
7,646 posts, read 4,596,067 times
Reputation: 12708
I put Detroit....though it's actually a proxy for Ann Arbor, but maybe Pittsburgh. Wherever the innovation hotspots are though is where you'll see demographic change. When you think of how few tech employees it takes to make the kind of money it took for a place like GM you'll see these areas dominated by techies. If an area becomes a tech hub, all other industries will surrender to it. US Steel is not going to be able to outbid Facebook for talent in overlapping areas.


There really will be an impetus on how well these new locations can truly govern this growth. Local government is going to matter. Locally, I see new places like Pleasantville and San Jose doing well, while rule-bound and ineffective San Francisco starts its march to the becoming a ghetto like Oakland. Silicon Valley will still be here, it will simply shift.



Phoenix will be one to watch with all of the semiconductor industry. Atlanta and Austin are already tech centers. NYC might be the sole match for tech from her finance markets, but that dominates already.



It's really going to be important for cities to attract at least enough innovation and support it locally with schools to stay relevant. Those that don't will decline and become service centers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2023, 09:33 PM
 
20 posts, read 17,163 times
Reputation: 46
For the Midwest, I'd say it's Columbus. It's slowly growing into a midwest powerhouse and it would get more diverse, would probably even start to get sizable numbers of people of all races coming from Chicago and NYC. Also, Pittsburgh would get more diversity as many hispanics, caribbeans and even asians expand into the area from NY, NJ and eastern PA. Outside of that Atlanta, Dallas, Orlando, and the Hampton roads region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2023, 05:30 AM
 
2,997 posts, read 3,102,136 times
Reputation: 5981
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
You are reading too much into my post. All I said was that Austin will be interesting to see in 20 years.
All I'm saying is, it's most likely just going to get WHITER in 20 years (and there's nothing interesting about that demographically...lol).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top