
06-25-2008, 12:14 PM
|
|
|
Location: Alexandria, VA
148 posts, read 621,553 times
Reputation: 120
|
|
What City (or Metro Area) has the least amount of trees?
|

06-25-2008, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
Location: Piedmont, CA
35,989 posts, read 63,770,105 times
Reputation: 20095
|
|
In my experience Las Vegas and Phoenix arent covered in trees the way other cities are but they still have lots of trees.
|

06-25-2008, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
Location: Savannah GA/Lk Hopatcong NJ
13,240 posts, read 27,484,162 times
Reputation: 11511
|
|
My guess would be the desert south west...Santa Fe?? Las Vegas??
|

06-25-2008, 12:19 PM
|
|
|
845 posts, read 2,661,882 times
Reputation: 535
|
|
Las Vegas? Anywhere in the desert.
|

06-25-2008, 12:22 PM
|
|
|
Location: los angeles
5,031 posts, read 12,178,860 times
Reputation: 1501
|
|
Good question. My guess is New York City since trees along streets [other than residential] are absent. Probably Chicago & most large East Coast/Midwest cities as well.
I wish there were more trees in Los Angeles but at least tree planting is done throughout the city [though palm trees are not planted as much since they don't provide enough shade].
|

06-25-2008, 12:24 PM
|
|
|
Location: Piedmont, CA
35,989 posts, read 63,770,105 times
Reputation: 20095
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by happ
Good question. My guess is New York City since trees along streets [other than residential] are absent. Probably Chicago & most large East Coast/Midwest cities as well.
|
SF too, could use lots more trees along sidewalks.
Quote:
I wish there were more trees in Los Angeles
|
Most cities probably feel the same way.
|

06-25-2008, 01:20 PM
|
|
|
Location: Chicagoland
4,028 posts, read 7,020,933 times
Reputation: 1330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by happ
Good question. My guess is New York City since trees along streets [other than residential] are absent. Probably Chicago & most large East Coast/Midwest cities as well.
I wish there were more trees in Los Angeles but at least tree planting is done throughout the city [though palm trees are not planted as much since they don't provide enough shade].
|
Chicago has a decent amount of trees for being such an urban place. Granted we're no PNW city.
|

06-25-2008, 01:31 PM
|
|
|
Location: Chicagoland
4,028 posts, read 7,020,933 times
Reputation: 1330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by happ
Good question. My guess is New York City since trees along streets [other than residential] are absent. Probably Chicago & most large East Coast/Midwest cities as well.
I wish there were more trees in Los Angeles but at least tree planting is done throughout the city [though palm trees are not planted as much since they don't provide enough shade].
|
Chicago has a decent amount of trees for being such an urban place. Granted it's no PNW city.
|

06-25-2008, 01:39 PM
|
|
|
Location: Phoenix metro
20,004 posts, read 74,896,384 times
Reputation: 10326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkate
My guess would be the desert south west...Santa Fe?? Las Vegas??
|
Santa Fe is up high, near pines, aspens, etc. Its not nearly as devoid of trees as places like Vegas, Phoenix, etc. And even then, places like Vegas and PHX have palo verdes, palms of different varieties, etc, but hardly any shade trees (which is what youd EXPECT places that hot to have--if they can survive).
|

06-25-2008, 01:58 PM
|
|
|
Location: Orange, California
1,575 posts, read 6,122,515 times
Reputation: 754
|
|
Las Vegas immediately came to my mind. Even before Phoenix.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|