Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What city will continue to attract more and more people?
New York 23 23.23%
Houston 27 27.27%
Atlanta 10 10.10%
Las Vegas 5 5.05%
Mesa, AZ 1 1.01%
Nashville, TN 3 3.03%
Santa Fe, NM 0 0%
Phoenix, AZ 7 7.07%
Glendale, CA 1 1.01%
Henderson, NV 0 0%
Austin, TX 11 11.11%
San Antonio, TX 3 3.03%
Chandler, AZ 1 1.01%
Charlotte, NC 5 5.05%
San Jose, CA 2 2.02%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:23 PM
 
98 posts, read 113,601 times
Reputation: 36

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kofi713 View Post
Yes they are in certain aspects like growth.

Why don't you? You're the one who said it without any links to back it up.

It's births and NYC's international migration. It has the most out of the top ten cities (now I'm just looking at metro areas, but assuming that if you break it down to the city, it'll stay relatively the same). For Chicago, it has relatively low international migration for a place its size, and it is also losing domestically.

So you're saying NYC's population is fueled solely from International migration and births?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:24 PM
 
98 posts, read 113,601 times
Reputation: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kofi713 View Post
Yes they are in certain aspects like growth.

Why don't you? You're the one who said it without any links to back it up.

It's births and NYC's international migration. It has the most out of the top ten cities (now I'm just looking at metro areas, but assuming that if you break it down to the city, it'll stay relatively the same). For Chicago, it has relatively low international migration for a place its size, and it is also losing domestically.

Didn't I say domestic + international is what puts New York's growth over-the-top?

Or are you saying NYC's population is fueled solely from International migration and births?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Houston
415 posts, read 506,071 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberal elite View Post
So you're saying NYC's population is fueled solely from International migration and births?
Yes. If you look at the domestic migration numbers for the metro, it is shows over 200,000 people each year. So, this far outweights the number of people moving in. I highly doubt NYC is gaining in the domestic department if its entire metro area is losing well over 200,000 every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:30 PM
 
98 posts, read 113,601 times
Reputation: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kofi713 View Post
Yes. If you look at the domestic migration numbers for the metro, it is shows over 200,000 people each year. So, this far outweights the number of people moving in. I highly doubt NYC is gaining in the domestic department if its entire metro area is losing well over 200,000 every year.
Why do you doubt that? New York CITY is and will always be a desirable place.

And, for the second time, the title of this thread asks "Which city will attract the most PEOPLE". Do internationals not count as people?

The correct answer to this poll is New York City. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Houston
415 posts, read 506,071 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberal elite View Post
Why do you doubt that? New York CITY is and will always be a desirable place.
Who said it wasn't a desirable place? I'm just saying that if the entire metro area is losing well over 200,000 people a year domestically, it's hard to believe that NYC is having a positive gain.

Now you said you had links, but you wanted me to go out and find them. Why don't you just provide them?

Quote:
And, for the second time, the title of this thread asks "Which city will attract the most PEOPLE". Do internationals not count as people?
What are you talking about? I already stated that NYC has strong international migration.

Quote:
The correct answer to this poll is New York City. Period.
Yes, New York City does. Metro area wise, it doesn't. Government boundaries, in terms of city limits, are so irrelevant in terms of growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Houston
415 posts, read 506,071 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberal elite View Post
Why do you doubt that? New York CITY is and will always be a desirable place.

And, for the second time, the title of this thread asks "Which city will attract the most PEOPLE". Do internationals not count as people?

The correct answer to this poll is New York City. Period.
Actually no. It appears that Houston was number one in the nation in terms of numerical gain this year again: Population Estimates for Places over 100,000: 2000 to 2006 (http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/SUB-EST2007.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Santa Barbara, California
162 posts, read 271,515 times
Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kofi713 View Post
Actually no. It appears that Houston was number one in the nation in terms of numerical gain this year again: Population Estimates for Places over 100,000: 2000 to 2006 (http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/SUB-EST2007.html - broken link)
No, it wasn't.

2000-2007

New York was the largest numerical gainer, adding 265,873 residents over the period. Houston, which added 233,876, was second. Five other Texas cities made the top 25: San Antonio, Fort Worth, Austin, McKinney and Dallas.

US Census Press Releases (http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012242.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Houston
415 posts, read 506,071 times
Reputation: 41
I'm talking about the single year from 2006-2007.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top