New Census Population Estimates (appointed, costs, shop)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did anybody mention Omaha and Lincolns growth in the last year?
If not here it is:
Omaha grew by 5049 from 427,872, to 432,921.
Lincoln Grew by about 4,000 to 248,744 .
Omaha has since annexted another 10,600 people so, july 1st 2008 may show Omaha growing past 450,000 people..
of course someone mentioned it, and if they annexed another town that is not growth.
no hes right los angeles reached past 4 million people look it up
Here are the most up to date population estimates by the US census bureau:
Population Estimates for Places over 100,000: 2000 to 2006 (http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/SUB-EST2007.html - broken link)
Los Angeles grew from 3,823,508 in 2006 to 3,834,340 in 2007, an annual growth rate of .3%. Had LA increased to 4 million, it would have been a growth rate of 4.5%, not witnessed in LA since the early 20th century.
I honestly don't rely too much on the U.S Census when it comes to estimates for California's Population or when it comes to defining our Metro Areas and Boundaries
I prefer the Estimates and Definition from In-State Sources.
That's ridiculous. There's no reason to prefer In-State sources. Simply because an organization exists within california, does not mean the demographic methods are better. In fact, the demography practiced at the US census bureau is more respected by academic demographers.
That's ridiculous. There's no reason to prefer In-State sources. Simply because an organization exists within california, does not mean the demographic methods are better. In fact, the demography practiced at the US census bureau is more respected by academic demographers.
That's right. Some people seem to think the Census Bureau is out to get them or shows favoritism, as if all Census workers are bureaucrats shipped in from Washington DC. But the Census Bureau hires local workers and relies on local statistics as well as things like tax returns to make their estimates. While they sometimes have to make adjustments, their estimates are usually pretty accurate.
That's right. Some people seem to think the Census Bureau is out to get them or shows favoritism, as if all Census workers are bureaucrats shipped in from Washington DC. But the Census Bureau hires local workers and relies on local statistics as well as things like tax returns to make their estimates. While they sometimes have to make adjustments, their estimates are usually pretty accurate.
Oh yes, a certain forumer here was/is convinced that NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg slipped the Census Bureau a $20 spot to add NJ Counties to the NYC metro area. A forumer who shall not be named, but who sometimes talks like this
Wow, people from Houston sure are grandiose. And who the f*ck cares about Omaha? I never knew people even talked about Omaha until I came here.
Thank you?lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
