Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
San Diego 1,359,132
San Diego metro 3,001,072 45.288%
Indianapolis 798,382
Indianapolis metro 1,715,459 46.54%
El Paso, Texas 665,055
El Paso metro 751,296 88.52%
(This might be inaccurate in that I think El Paso and Juarez, Mexico I think are sometimes deemed a bi-national metropolitan area or some of El Paso's metro might be in Mexico anyway)
Louisville, Kentucky 557,224 when "balanced."
Louisville metro 1,244,696 44.77%
And I better stop there for now. Hope I did the math right.
And, conversely, many younger professionals choose to live in cities like SF and Manhattan (de facto suburbs) and simply drive daily to jobs in SiliconValley and Greenwich, respectively....
the most valid point hsw has ever made.
some offices in stamford even pick up employees in manhattan via buses.
some offices in stamford even pick up employees in manhattan via buses.
Yep. I have a friend that lives in the Village, but works for Master Card out in Purchase. They have a free employee bus that takes them back and forth every day. Pretty decent perk, imo.
I was thinking if there is a way to deliniate how percentage-wise an area is based on density. Since some areas the urban core could be larger or smaller than the central city. (or even cases where its not corellated with it) It would be interesting to see it broken down to urban/suburban/exurban/rural, with likely definition based on density of either area or housing stock.
I was thinking if there is a way to deliniate how percentage-wise an area is based on density. Since some areas the urban core could be larger or smaller than the central city. (or even cases where its not corellated with it) It would be interesting to see it broken down to urban/suburban/exurban/rural, with likely definition based on density of either area or housing stock.
You could in theory compare the UA to the MSA or CSA
As an example:
Philadelphia
City 1,548,000 to CSA 6,385,000 or 24.2%
UA (Urban Area) 5,325,00 to CSA 6,385,000 or 83.4%
Houston
City 2,243,000 to CSA 5,968,500 or 37.6%
UA 3,822,500 to CSA 5,968,500 or 64.0%
Omaha
(2008 Est.)
City 438,646 51.6% of Metro
Metro 849,517
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.