U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 09-01-2008, 08:39 AM
Location: Portland OR
404 posts, read 1,265,314 times
Reputation: 213


So, apparently it's not unheard of for hospitals to provide moderate duration emergency care at the cost of >$1million per patient, all while letting patients with kidney, heart problems and other long term issues who are unable to pay for continuing care die away?

No Cheap Shot

What makes some gangbangers that shoot eachother worthy of rendering >$1million in emergency care at the expense of many other patients who don't engage in reckless gang lifestyle not being able to receive care?

People are marrying/divorcing, dying, losing assets over being able to get treatment. All this, but the government has the money to provide emergency care at the expense of >$1million to ONE person? That's absurd.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Powered by Foreclosure.com
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top