Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2008, 01:28 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,631,650 times
Reputation: 13630

Advertisements

I recently saw something that talked about how NYC has a greater risk of earthquakes than previously thought b/c of a newly discovered fault nearby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2008, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,298,460 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnehahapolitan View Post
Charleston, S.C is also somewhat prone.
A quake in the 6.0-6.9 there on Aug. 31, 1886.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top