Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2008, 05:43 PM
 
Location: St. Louis, MO
3,742 posts, read 8,398,001 times
Reputation: 660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeard View Post
Ha! it also says Maryland, Delaware, and West Virginia are the south? Well, what is West Virginia? It's not the midwest, not the northeast. It's the Appalachians! It all depends how refined your categories are.
even individual states differ. Western Pennsylvania should probably be like the Upper midwest, but obviously the state is not considered the midwest.

Different parts of Texas are even different. Different parts of California or New York, or Minnesota or Georgia are different. Yippee!
Yes, but overall a state leans decidely one way. West Virginia has most in common with the Upper South. There is no reason to say that something is impossible to classify if it has more than 50% in common with a certain region. Yes, each state is different. But certain states have more than enough characteristics in common with each other to be grouped into a certain region. It's just like being friends with somebody...common interests, thinking alike, similar points of view...we may not be the same height, we're not all the same gender, we're not all the same skin color, but there are more similarities between us than differences...that is how big groups of friends form. A similar principle comes to play when classifying regions...yes, no two states are exactly alike...no two cities are exactly alike...but the amount they have in common outweighs the overall differences. That is what justifies putting certain states into regions, and frankly, I agree with the logic. If we were to say that even the smallest difference meant you couldn't be in the same region, that would be like saying two people can't form friendships because of a small difference between them..not only is it ridiculous, it makes no sense. I'm not saying being in the same region has anything to do with being friends, btw..my best friend is from a different region than me. But you get the overall gist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2008, 06:59 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,812,854 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajf131 View Post
Yes, but overall a state leans decidely one way. West Virginia has most in common with the Upper South. There is no reason to say that something is impossible to classify if it has more than 50% in common with a certain region. Yes, each state is different. But certain states have more than enough characteristics in common with each other to be grouped into a certain region. It's just like being friends with somebody...common interests, thinking alike, similar points of view...we may not be the same height, we're not all the same gender, we're not all the same skin color, but there are more similarities between us than differences...that is how big groups of friends form. A similar principle comes to play when classifying regions...yes, no two states are exactly alike...no two cities are exactly alike...but the amount they have in common outweighs the overall differences. That is what justifies putting certain states into regions, and frankly, I agree with the logic. If we were to say that even the smallest difference meant you couldn't be in the same region, that would be like saying two people can't form friendships because of a small difference between them..not only is it ridiculous, it makes no sense. I'm not saying being in the same region has anything to do with being friends, btw..my best friend is from a different region than me. But you get the overall gist.
What does West Virginia have in common with the South? The coal mining culture? That seems to be dominate there, but nowhere else in the South but maybe Kentucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2008, 10:55 PM
 
Location: St. Louis, MO
3,742 posts, read 8,398,001 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
What does West Virginia have in common with the South? The coal mining culture? That seems to be dominate there, but nowhere else in the South but maybe Kentucky.
In case you didn't know, West Virginia was once a part of Virginia. And 2/3 of its soldiers in the Civil War were on the side of the Confederacy. Not to mention the life-style of the state is slow paced, conservative, and laid back, it is very poor in most areas, and Southern accents and culture are a strong presence in at least 2/3 of the state. Not to mention, its political views have pretty much always been the same as those of the other southern states.

Last edited by ajf131; 12-10-2008 at 11:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2008, 11:35 PM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,112,570 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
This argument is so old and tiresome...Texas would be taking a step up to be included in the South...

It's funny how people love to rag on big powerful states that have a lot going for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2008, 11:55 PM
 
Location: OKIE-Ville
5,546 posts, read 9,508,162 times
Reputation: 3309
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajf131 View Post
Most claim Missouri and Kansas to be part of the Midwest, and most claim Kentucky to be part of the South. Most claim Oklahoma to be part of the South. The census bureau is incorrect about Maryland and Delaware...they are Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Oklahoma has a few Midwestern characteristics about it but is decidely more Southern than either Southwestern or Midwestern...Kentucky has a few Midwestern characteristics but many more Southern ones. Missouri and Kansas have some Southern influence, but are decidedly more like the Midwest than the South. They are what we call the Lower Midwest...Kentucky and Oklahoma best fit the definition of Upper South. Whichever way a state leans most towards is the region it fits in the best with. Tulsa fits in far better with the South than with the Midwest...just because something isn't 100% in a certain region doesn't mean you can just write off as being a borderline case....a borderline case is 50-50, and all the areas you are attempting to call borderline clearly lean one way much more than the other. So as far as I am concerned, this isn't a round and round argument. This is simply a need not to go into details.
Excellent and very accurate observations. For those who have not been to Oklahoma or another border state like Kentucky, you have done a thorough job of explaining to them what to expect culturally. Well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2008, 12:02 AM
 
Location: Texas
11 posts, read 22,210 times
Reputation: 11
Post Deep South

Well, I am sort of a history buff when it comes to the "Deep South" as we are refered to.
The south directing it's attentions of the market of slaves and slave ran plantatin. If you follow the loss and gains of history of this civil war, you will see that Texas is a Deep southern state. All you have to do is look up the civil war using google..
good luck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2008, 02:16 AM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,812,854 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajf131 View Post
In case you didn't know, West Virginia was once a part of Virginia. And 2/3 of its soldiers in the Civil War were on the side of the Confederacy. Not to mention the life-style of the state is slow paced, conservative, and laid back, it is very poor in most areas, and Southern accents and culture are a strong presence in at least 2/3 of the state. Not to mention, its political views have pretty much always been the same as those of the other southern states.
Yes, I knew that West Virginia was once part of Virginia - pretty much anyone knows that. I'm talking about now...not 150 years ago. I know there are a lot of country folk in West Virginia, which has nothing to do with a southern accent, but I don't know that southern culture is dominate there. You may be referring to the recent elections as far as political views, but go a little further back to see some variety in the South.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2008, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
1,342 posts, read 3,246,475 times
Reputation: 1533
Here is the Univ. of PA map of Southern dialect, some of you may find it interesting. It agrees pretty much with other studies on dialect.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2008, 08:23 PM
 
Location: New Mexico to Texas
4,552 posts, read 15,029,225 times
Reputation: 2171
So the Southern accent ranges from Eastern New Mexico all the way to Southern Delaware, thats a good distance.

I would think that Southern Louisiana would have its own cause of the Cajuns, but I dont know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2008, 08:26 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,610,755 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by desert sun View Post
So the Southern accent ranges from Eastern New Mexico all the way to Southern Delaware, thats a good distance.

I would think that Southern Louisiana would have its own cause of the Cajuns, but I dont know.
You are right, DS. Yes, it IS a good distance; and one of the things important in this realm is that there is no such thing as a single uniform "Southern Accent." Even though "Hollywood" has made it seem so. LOL

I always thought this quote summed it up pretty well:

Contrary to popular belief, there is no single "Southern accent". Instead, there are a number of sub-regional dialects found across the Southern United States which are collectively known as Southern American English. However, these different varieties often share commonalities of accent and idiom easily distinguishable from that spoken in other regions of the United States and identify it as being "Southern", particularly to other Americans. Although different "Southern" dialects exist, they are all mutually intelligible, as are US and British English more broadly.

Southern American English - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your observation about the south Louisiana "Cajun dialect"...and I might add (from what I have heard...no pun intended! LOL), the speech of the Charleston, South Carolina area being something truly different as concerns SAE...is very noteworthy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top