Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2009, 03:28 PM
 
Location: West Coast
1,310 posts, read 4,138,164 times
Reputation: 698

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetclimber View Post
Your surprised that LA, Miami are on the fat list??? Those cities are NOT what you see on the TV media. I see way more fit people in Houston than I ever saw in those 2 cities.
Granted I've never been to Miami, having lived in SoCal, I have to say that they are very fit. In terms of the lower income areas of LA, I don't know, maybe since they tend to be obese they pull down LA's ranking. Go to LA's West side and trying to find obese people is like looking for Waldo in "Where's Waldo."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2009, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,954,125 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonjj View Post
Another list making no sense. Miami as the fattest city?? Maybe I missed that on my visits.
How many people have "noticed" on their "visits" to Canada that the obesity rate there is less than half of what it is in the USA? Would you actually notice, in a Canadian supermarket, that only one person out of 7 is obese, instead of the one out of 3 that you are accustomed to seeing in the USA?

I'd like to see the metrics used in this moronic puff-piece. I bet they slit open the CDC press release and got obesity rates for all cities, and assumed that people who are not fat must be fit and people who are not fit must be fat. Have they looked at an NFL interior offensive lineman lately? Fit, or fat? Can't have it both ways. And then, they only counted 50 cities, which means Kansas City (25th fattest) is in a virtual tie with Pittsburgh (25th fittest).

This article looks like it written by an in-house intern at the magazine, given the assignment after lunch with a 4-pm deadline. The only research he did was to go to MapQuest and look up the distance between Miami and Salt Lake City.

Last edited by jtur88; 01-15-2009 at 03:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 04:06 PM
 
2,598 posts, read 4,924,801 times
Reputation: 2275
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdy1985 View Post
Yeah, and people joke about the Milwaukee Tumor (beer belly) and how Wisconsin is very fat. Now all of a sudden MKE is one of the fittest cities? Then San Jose, San Diego, LA, and Miami are fat cities? WTF?
Milwaukee was tenth last year - they've slipped to eleventh. Believe it or not, everyone there is not fat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 04:23 PM
 
Location: West Coast
1,310 posts, read 4,138,164 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by NowInWI View Post
Milwaukee was tenth last year - they've slipped to eleventh. Believe it or not, everyone there is not fat.
I don't know how they got the stereotype.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 04:31 PM
 
2,598 posts, read 4,924,801 times
Reputation: 2275
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdy1985 View Post
I don't know how they got the stereotype.
Probably because everyone thinks of beer and cheese when they think of Wisconsin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Houston
6,870 posts, read 14,854,658 times
Reputation: 5891
It's nice to see that Houston is no longer the fattest city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Florida
1,782 posts, read 3,941,069 times
Reputation: 964
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetclimber View Post
Your surprised that LA, Miami are on the fat list??? Those cities are NOT what you see on the TV media. I see way more fit people in Houston than I ever saw in those 2 cities.
LA is #21 fattest.

Houston is #6 fattest.

If I remember correctly, Houston was #1 in a previous year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Houston Texas
2,915 posts, read 3,515,744 times
Reputation: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by th3vault View Post
LA is #21 fattest.

Houston is #6 fattest.

If I remember correctly, Houston was #1 in a previous year.
And Miami is #1 so what is your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Orange, California
1,576 posts, read 6,349,028 times
Reputation: 758
Can't see how San Diego made the list of fattest cities, but I suppose it simply demonstrates the arbitrariness of these lists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2009, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,183,316 times
Reputation: 6958
The main thing is that you bought their magazine to read their statistics. The magazine has your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top