Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
OKC, Tulsa, Little Rock, all the conservative places nobody wants to move. As for major cities, Dallas probably takes the cost of living crown, but even it is way more expensive than the other cities I mentioned.
Chicago. It may be expensive by midwest standards, but I think it wins it for biggest bang for your buck. It is almost NYC, but a fraction of the price.
Location: Cleveland, OH USA / formerly Chicago for 20 years
4,069 posts, read 7,316,982 times
Reputation: 3062
Cleveland, if you can find gainful employment there and can live with many overcast days and long, cold, very snowy winters. It has all the cultural, entertainment, and recreational amenities you would expect of a big city -- it rivals much bigger cities in those areas -- but at a far lower cost of living (especially housing).
You're not going to feel like you're in NYC by any means -- it doesn't have the type of urban bustle and energy that knocks you off your feet like that -- but I'd say Cleveland probably has the best Cost-of-Living to Urban-Quality-Of-Life ratio of any city around.
But property taxes tend to be on the high side, and there is the city occupational tax, which not all places have.
When I lived in Pittsburgh, I found out unknowingly (until they did it) that they take Fifty dollars out of your paycheck to live in the city. I thought this was very odd. Is this the city occupational tax you are talking about?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.