Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009, 09:50 PM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,950,687 times
Reputation: 3908

Advertisements

In Illinois, I believe the densest city is Stone Park, a suburb of Chicago, with a pop density of 15,378/sq mile. Chicago is not too far behind at 12,649.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2009, 12:33 AM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,314 posts, read 9,238,078 times
Reputation: 2538
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalyKidd View Post
SF I though was the second densest city after all of NYC?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo View Post
It is if you only consider "major" cities. Lots of tiny towns with very high density.
The thing is, those tiny, dense cities (such as Union City NJ), are by and large basically the same as the denser neighborhoods in bigger cities...they just have the distinction of having their own city government and boundaries.

For example San Francisco has neighborhoods the same size as Union City, NJ with equal population densities (about 50,000 per square mile). If you chop it down more, and go into census tracts, SF has some that approach 100,000 people per square mile. These are obviously small sections of the densest neighborhoods however (Chinatown, The Tenderloin, and Lower Nob Hill, aka "the tendernob"). The same goes for many other large cities. So you see it's hard to accurately compare areas that are so vastly different in geographic size.

As for the neighborhood I live in in SF, it has a population density of around 20,000 per square mile, and the city as a whole comes out to about 16,000 per square mile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2009, 11:05 AM
 
3,353 posts, read 6,441,085 times
Reputation: 1128
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
WOW! TX has such amazing density!!!......
Your playing right? lol

I wonder what's the densest part of Wyoming. lol

Here is a old density map (came out in 2000), a new one will come out next year!!!

http://merlot.caliper.com/maptitude/...mapimage.y=235

Last edited by BMORE; 02-16-2009 at 11:40 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top